[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c774fe18362b4cc19111078f2cd9ae82@denx.de>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 07:52:25 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...x.de>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, michael@...le.cc,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, marex@...x.de,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] serial: imx: Suppress false positive sysrq lockdep
warning
Hi Johan,
On 06/10/2021 05:10, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Ok, thanks for testing. The above is what I meant and it does fix the
> false-positive lockdep splat which motivated
> uart_unlock_and_check_sysrq() to be added in the first place.
>
> Looking closer at the splat you reported (which you've edited quite
> heavily), it becomes apparent that you are now hitting a different
> locking issue. And it's not a false positive this time.
>
> There a problem with the workqueue debugging code, which unless fixed
> at
> the source, would prevent any console driver from queueing work while
> holding a lock also taken in their write paths. And
> tty_flip_buffer_push() is just one example of many.
>
> I can easily reproduce the splat with another serial driver, and I've
> also been able to trigger the actual deadlock.
>
> I've prepared a patch that takes care of the workqueue state dumping,
> which I'll send as a reply to this mail. Would you mind giving it a
> spin
> with the imx driver as well?
Yes, after applying only your patch I no longer get the lockdep
splat. I have replied with my Tested-by, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists