lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 Oct 2021 14:11:03 +0300
From:   "Paraschiv, Andra-Irina" <andraprs@...zon.com>
To:     "Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)" 
        <longpeng2@...wei.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@...wei.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "kamal@...onical.com" <kamal@...onical.com>,
        "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "sgarzare@...hat.com" <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
        "stefanha@...hat.com" <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        "vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "ne-devel-upstream@...zon.com" <ne-devel-upstream@...zon.com>,
        "lexnv@...zon.com" <lexnv@...zon.com>,
        "alcioa@...zon.com" <alcioa@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] nitro_enclaves: merge contiguous physical memory
 regions



On 05/10/2021 16:54, Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service 
Product Dept.) wrote:
> 
> Hi Andra,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Paraschiv, Andra-Irina [mailto:andraprs@...zon.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, October 3, 2021 9:01 PM
>> To: Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)
>> <longpeng2@...wei.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Gonglei (Arei) <arei.gonglei@...wei.com>;
>> gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; kamal@...onical.com; pbonzini@...hat.com;
>> sgarzare@...hat.com; stefanha@...hat.com; vkuznets@...hat.com;
>> ne-devel-upstream@...zon.com; lexnv@...zon.com; alcioa@...zon.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] nitro_enclaves: merge contiguous physical memory
>> regions
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21/09/2021 18:10, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
>>> There can be cases when there are more memory regions that need to be
>>> set for an enclave than the maximum supported number of memory regions
>>> per enclave. One example can be when the memory regions are backed by 2
>>> MiB hugepages (the minimum supported hugepage size).
>>>
>>> Let's merge the adjacent regions if they are physical contiguous. This
>>> way the final number of memory regions is less than before merging and
>>> could potentially avoid reaching maximum.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Please add the changelog for each of the patches in the series, in
>> addition to the one in the cover letter.
>>
>> Also please start the commit titles for all the patches with upper-case
>> letter e.g. nitro_enclaves: Merge contiguous physical memory regions
>>
> 
> OK, thanks.
> 
>>>    drivers/virt/nitro_enclaves/ne_misc_dev.c | 87
>> ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>>    1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/virt/nitro_enclaves/ne_misc_dev.c
>> b/drivers/virt/nitro_enclaves/ne_misc_dev.c
>>> index e21e1e8..a4776fc 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/virt/nitro_enclaves/ne_misc_dev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/virt/nitro_enclaves/ne_misc_dev.c
>>> @@ -126,6 +126,26 @@ struct ne_cpu_pool {
>>>    static struct ne_cpu_pool ne_cpu_pool;
>>>
>>>    /**
>>> + * struct phys_mem_region - Physical memory region
>>> + * @paddr: The start physical address of the region.
>>> + * @size:  The sizeof of the region.
>>> + */
>>> +struct phys_mem_region {
>>> +   u64 paddr;
>>> +   u64 size;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * struct phys_contig_mem_region - Physical contiguous memory regions
>>> + * @num:   The number of regions that currently has.
>>> + * @region:        The array of physical memory regions.
>>> + */
>>> +struct phys_contig_mem_region {
>>> +   unsigned long num;
>>> +   struct phys_mem_region region[0];
>>> +};
>>
>> Let's have a single data structure here instead of two, since they are
>> not used separately, they come altogether. For example:
>>
>> struct ne_phys_contig_mem_regions {
>>           unsigned long   num;
>>           u64             *paddr;
>>           u64             *size;
>> };
>>
> 
> I agree that the 'struct phys_mem_region' should be removed, but originally
> I want to use 'struct range' instead, because 'paddr' and 'size' should be
> used in pairs and we can see there're several cases in kernel that use 'range'
> to manage their memory regions. Would this be acceptable to you ?

If there is about this "struct range" [1], then yes, let's see how that 
would work. Then would be physical addresses ranges and could calculate 
the physical contig memory region size based on the range start and end.

Thanks,
Andra

[1] 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/range.h

> 
>> And then can allocate memory for "paddr" and "size" using "max_nr_pages"
>> from the "ne_set_user_memory_region_ioctl" logic.
>>
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>>     * ne_check_enclaves_created() - Verify if at least one enclave has been
>> created.
>>>     * @void: No parameters provided.
>>>     *
>>> @@ -824,6 +844,27 @@ static int ne_sanity_check_user_mem_region_page(struct
>> ne_enclave *ne_enclave,
>>>      return 0;
>>>    }
>>>
>>> +static void ne_add_phys_memory_region(struct phys_contig_mem_region
>> *regions,
>>> +                                 u64 paddr, u64 size)
>>
>> Please add a comment before the function signature, similar to the other
>> existing functions, including a brief description of the function, the
>> parameters and the return value.
>>
>> Could be "ne_merge_phys_contig_memory_regions" and specifically mention
>> "page_paddr" and "page_size", instead of "paddr" and "size".
>>
> 
> OK, will do.
> 
>>> +{
>>> +   u64 prev_phys_region_end = 0;
>>> +
>>> +   if (regions->num) {
>>> +           prev_phys_region_end = regions->region[regions->num - 1].paddr +
>>> +                                   regions->region[regions->num - 1].size;
>>> +
>>> +           /* Physical contiguous, just merge */
>>> +           if (prev_phys_region_end == paddr) {
>>> +                   regions->region[regions->num - 1].size += size;
>>> +                   return;
>>> +           }
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   regions->region[regions->num].paddr = paddr;
>>> +   regions->region[regions->num].size = size;
>>> +   regions->num++;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    /**
>>>     * ne_set_user_memory_region_ioctl() - Add user space memory region to the
>> slot
>>>     *                                       associated with the current enclave.
>>> @@ -843,9 +884,9 @@ static int ne_set_user_memory_region_ioctl(struct
>> ne_enclave *ne_enclave,
>>>      unsigned long max_nr_pages = 0;
>>>      unsigned long memory_size = 0;
>>>      struct ne_mem_region *ne_mem_region = NULL;
>>> -   unsigned long nr_phys_contig_mem_regions = 0;
>>>      struct pci_dev *pdev = ne_devs.ne_pci_dev->pdev;
>>> -   struct page **phys_contig_mem_regions = NULL;
>>> +   struct phys_contig_mem_region *phys_regions = NULL;
>>
>> "phys_contig_mem_regions" instead of "phys_regions", to be more specific.
>>
> 
> Will do, thanks.
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Andra
>>
>>> +   size_t size_to_alloc = 0;
>>>      int rc = -EINVAL;
>>>
>>>      rc = ne_sanity_check_user_mem_region(ne_enclave, mem_region);
>>> @@ -866,9 +907,9 @@ static int ne_set_user_memory_region_ioctl(struct
>> ne_enclave *ne_enclave,
>>>              goto free_mem_region;
>>>      }
>>>
>>> -   phys_contig_mem_regions = kcalloc(max_nr_pages,
>> sizeof(*phys_contig_mem_regions),
>>> -                                     GFP_KERNEL);
>>> -   if (!phys_contig_mem_regions) {
>>> +   size_to_alloc = sizeof(*phys_regions) + max_nr_pages * sizeof(struct
>> phys_mem_region);
>>> +   phys_regions = kzalloc(size_to_alloc, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +   if (!phys_regions) {
>>>              rc = -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>>              goto free_mem_region;
>>> @@ -901,27 +942,15 @@ static int ne_set_user_memory_region_ioctl(struct
>> ne_enclave *ne_enclave,
>>>              if (rc < 0)
>>>                      goto put_pages;
>>>
>>> -           /*
>>> -            * TODO: Update once handled non-contiguous memory regions
>>> -            * received from user space or contiguous physical memory regions
>>> -            * larger than 2 MiB e.g. 8 MiB.
>>> -            */
>>> -           phys_contig_mem_regions[i] = ne_mem_region->pages[i];
>>> +           ne_add_phys_memory_region(phys_regions,
>> page_to_phys(ne_mem_region->pages[i]),
>>> +                                     page_size(ne_mem_region->pages[i]));
>>>
>>>              memory_size += page_size(ne_mem_region->pages[i]);
>>>
>>>              ne_mem_region->nr_pages++;
>>>      } while (memory_size < mem_region.memory_size);
>>>
>>> -   /*
>>> -    * TODO: Update once handled non-contiguous memory regions received
>>> -    * from user space or contiguous physical memory regions larger than
>>> -    * 2 MiB e.g. 8 MiB.
>>> -    */
>>> -   nr_phys_contig_mem_regions = ne_mem_region->nr_pages;
>>> -
>>> -   if ((ne_enclave->nr_mem_regions + nr_phys_contig_mem_regions) >
>>> -       ne_enclave->max_mem_regions) {
>>> +   if ((ne_enclave->nr_mem_regions + phys_regions->num) >
>> ne_enclave->max_mem_regions) {
>>>              dev_err_ratelimited(ne_misc_dev.this_device,
>>>                                  "Reached max memory regions %lld\n",
>>>                                  ne_enclave->max_mem_regions);
>>> @@ -931,9 +960,9 @@ static int ne_set_user_memory_region_ioctl(struct
>> ne_enclave *ne_enclave,
>>>              goto put_pages;
>>>      }
>>>
>>> -   for (i = 0; i < nr_phys_contig_mem_regions; i++) {
>>> -           u64 phys_region_addr = page_to_phys(phys_contig_mem_regions[i]);
>>> -           u64 phys_region_size = page_size(phys_contig_mem_regions[i]);
>>> +   for (i = 0; i < phys_regions->num; i++) {
>>> +           u64 phys_region_addr = phys_regions->region[i].paddr;
>>> +           u64 phys_region_size = phys_regions->region[i].size;
>>>
>>>              if (phys_region_size & (NE_MIN_MEM_REGION_SIZE - 1)) {
>>>                      dev_err_ratelimited(ne_misc_dev.this_device,
>>> @@ -959,13 +988,13 @@ static int ne_set_user_memory_region_ioctl(struct
>> ne_enclave *ne_enclave,
>>>
>>>      list_add(&ne_mem_region->mem_region_list_entry,
>> &ne_enclave->mem_regions_list);
>>>
>>> -   for (i = 0; i < nr_phys_contig_mem_regions; i++) {
>>> +   for (i = 0; i < phys_regions->num; i++) {
>>>              struct ne_pci_dev_cmd_reply cmd_reply = {};
>>>              struct slot_add_mem_req slot_add_mem_req = {};
>>>
>>>              slot_add_mem_req.slot_uid = ne_enclave->slot_uid;
>>> -           slot_add_mem_req.paddr = page_to_phys(phys_contig_mem_regions[i]);
>>> -           slot_add_mem_req.size = page_size(phys_contig_mem_regions[i]);
>>> +           slot_add_mem_req.paddr = phys_regions->region[i].paddr;
>>> +           slot_add_mem_req.size = phys_regions->region[i].size;
>>>
>>>              rc = ne_do_request(pdev, SLOT_ADD_MEM,
>>>                                 &slot_add_mem_req, sizeof(slot_add_mem_req),
>>> @@ -974,7 +1003,7 @@ static int ne_set_user_memory_region_ioctl(struct
>> ne_enclave *ne_enclave,
>>>                      dev_err_ratelimited(ne_misc_dev.this_device,
>>>                                          "Error in slot add mem [rc=%d]\n", rc);
>>>
>>> -                   kfree(phys_contig_mem_regions);
>>> +                   kfree(phys_regions);
>>>
>>>                      /*
>>>                       * Exit here without put pages as memory regions may
>>> @@ -987,7 +1016,7 @@ static int ne_set_user_memory_region_ioctl(struct
>> ne_enclave *ne_enclave,
>>>              ne_enclave->nr_mem_regions++;
>>>      }
>>>
>>> -   kfree(phys_contig_mem_regions);
>>> +   kfree(phys_regions);
>>>
>>>      return 0;
>>>
>>> @@ -995,7 +1024,7 @@ static int ne_set_user_memory_region_ioctl(struct
>> ne_enclave *ne_enclave,
>>>      for (i = 0; i < ne_mem_region->nr_pages; i++)
>>>              put_page(ne_mem_region->pages[i]);
>>>    free_mem_region:
>>> -   kfree(phys_contig_mem_regions);
>>> +   kfree(phys_regions);
>>>      kfree(ne_mem_region->pages);
>>>      kfree(ne_mem_region);
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Amazon Development Center (Romania) S.R.L. registered office: 27A Sf. Lazar
>> Street, UBC5, floor 2, Iasi, Iasi County, 700045, Romania. Registered in Romania.
>> Registration number J22/2621/2005.



Amazon Development Center (Romania) S.R.L. registered office: 27A Sf. Lazar Street, UBC5, floor 2, Iasi, Iasi County, 700045, Romania. Registered in Romania. Registration number J22/2621/2005.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists