[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB284889475EC08A5405F2CFA0E1B09@SN6PR11MB2848.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 14:28:37 +0000
From: <Don.Brace@...rochip.com>
To: <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>, <Kevin.Barnett@...rochip.com>,
<Scott.Teel@...rochip.com>, <Justin.Lindley@...rochip.com>,
<Scott.Benesh@...rochip.com>, <Gerry.Morong@...rochip.com>,
<Mahesh.Rajashekhara@...rochip.com>, <Mike.McGowen@...rochip.com>,
<Murthy.Bhat@...rochip.com>, <Balsundar.P@...rochip.com>,
<joseph.szczypek@....com>, <jeff@...onical.com>,
<POSWALD@...e.com>, <john.p.donnelly@...cle.com>,
<mwilck@...e.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<hch@...radead.org>, <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [smartpqi updates PATCH V2 09/11] smartpqi: fix duplicate device
nodes for tape changers
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin K. Petersen [mailto:martin.petersen@...cle.com]
Subject: Re: [smartpqi updates PATCH V2 09/11] smartpqi: fix duplicate device nodes for tape changers
Don,
> DON: Done in V3, thanks for your review.
Just a heads up that I already staged this for zeroday testing yesterday. If you post a v3 I'll drop what I have. But I would prefer an incremental patch.
Thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
DON: Incremental patch it is. I appreciate this.
Thanks,
Don
Powered by blists - more mailing lists