[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb403fbe-2ac2-f9d2-ac86-35e63b4210a8@marcan.st>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 00:27:31 +0900
From: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, maz@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, arnd@...nel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
alyssa@...enzweig.io, krzk@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, rafael@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: power: Add apple,pmgr-pwrstate binding
On 06/10/2021 05.16, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Or we drop the apple,mpgr-pwrstate and go with only SoC-specific
> compatibles from that point onwards.
I think if Apple has discrete compat breaks and several SoCs still share
compatibility, it'd make sense to encode those as pmgr-pwrstate-v2, v3,
etc. That way compatible SoCs can continue to benefit from
forwards-compatible kernels, and we only end up with a hard dep on a new
kernel for incompatible SoCs.
--
Hector Martin (marcan@...can.st)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub
Powered by blists - more mailing lists