[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YV3JWzNgGInZ1Bt5@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 19:05:47 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt5640: Use temporary variable
for struct device
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 04:48:57PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:44:07PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 08:21:01AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > > Some will complain about a lack of commit message.
>
> > Yeah, sorry for that, it wasn't deliberate. I forgot to run `git msg-filter`
> > on these three patches to add it.
>
> > Mark, do you want me resend entire bunch(es) or just starting from these
> > patches? Or...?
>
> If you're adding a commit message with automation it's probably not
> adding any value.
What do you mean? I add it exceptionally for the same (by nature) patches.
What do you expect to be altered in these three, if the idea behind the change
is very well the same?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists