linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Move intel_iommu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YV3LYqmsijqVAa5Y@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Oct 2021 19:14:26 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Move intel_iommu_ops to header file

On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 10:20:08AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> 
> On 7/30/21 12:35 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Compiler is not happy about hidden declaration of intel_iommu_ops.
> > 
> > .../drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c:414:24: warning: symbol 'intel_iommu_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > 
> > Move declaration to header file to make compiler happy.
> 
> Thanks for the cleanup. Sharing data structures between different files
> doesn't seem to be a good design. How about adding a helper so that the
> intel_iommu_ops could be a static one?

I don't see any change in the upstream. What's the plan?
Can we take my patch as a quick fix?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko