[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YV3NxPehVt3Ju+5p@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 19:24:36 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt5640: use
devm_clk_get_optional() for mclk
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 10:54:12AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 10/6/21 10:04 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The devm_clk_get_optional() helper returns NULL when devm_clk_get()
> > returns -ENOENT. This makes things slightly cleaner. The added benefit
> > is mostly cosmetic.
...
> > if (SND_SOC_DAPM_EVENT_ON(event)) {
> > - if (byt_rt5640_quirk & BYT_RT5640_MCLK_EN) {
>
> same comment as for rt5651, I don't see the point of removing the test
> on this quirk?
Same answers.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists