[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABCJKueL4Ebaan=JBUyO3oewq7RTHHXWUQpixgf2AfC_r5T3uA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 09:31:04 -0700
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/15] ftrace: Use an opaque type for functions not
callable from C
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 6:02 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:29:45 -0700
> Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for Cc'ing me, as I should have been Cc'd on the original patch.
Sorry about that. I'll make sure you're cc'd on the next version.
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:05:22AM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > > With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, the compiler changes function references to point
> > > to the CFI jump table. As ftrace_call, ftrace_regs_call, and mcount_call
> > > are not called from C, use DECLARE_ASM_FUNC_SYMBOL to declare them.
>
> "not called from C" is a bit confusing.
Any thoughts on how to make this less confusing?
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists