[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211006140655.6381bc5d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 14:06:55 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
Hi Peter,
On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:18:53 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 11:33:30AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc_ppc64
> > defconfig) produced this warning:
> >
> > kernel/sched/debug.c: In function 'print_cfs_group_stats':
> > kernel/sched/debug.c:460:41: warning: unused variable 'stats' [-Wunused-variable]
> > 460 | struct sched_statistics *stats = __schedstats_from_se(se);
> > | ^~~~~
>
> So I've not seen that one *yet*, I've dont a bunch of SCHEDSTAT=n
> builds. I do think GCC is being quite stupid for giving it, seeing how
> the whole thing is within if (0). The GCC people seem to disagree when I
> brought it up.
>
> Anyway, what I did in other parts was the below; that seems to 'upgrade'
> the warnings from -Wunused-variable to -Wunused-but-set-variable, and
> that latter *is* in W=1, and I'm arguing it should be promoted to W=2 or
> thereabout.
>
> Given that whole if(0) {} thing, I don't feel motivated to change things
> overly much and quite strongly feel this is the compiler being daft.
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> index 935dad7dffb7..ef71de01e4d7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -457,7 +457,8 @@ static void print_cfs_group_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct task_group
> PN(se->sum_exec_runtime);
>
> if (schedstat_enabled()) {
> - struct sched_statistics *stats = __schedstats_from_se(se);
> + struct sched_statistics *stats;
> + stats = __schedstats_from_se(se);
>
> PN_SCHEDSTAT(wait_start);
> PN_SCHEDSTAT(sleep_start);
Any progress on this? I am still getting the warning.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists