[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211007130748.GA2834485@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 10:07:48 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Aharon Landau <aharonl@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...dia.com>,
Mark Zhang <markzhang@...dia.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>,
Neta Ostrovsky <netao@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@...lsio.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>,
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v3 09/13] RDMA/nldev: Allow optional-counter
status configuration through RDMA netlink
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 12:52:12PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> @@ -1986,11 +2030,13 @@ static int nldev_stat_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> goto end;
> }
>
> - if (!tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_STAT_MODE]) {
> + if (tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_STAT_MODE])
> + ret = nldev_stat_set_mode_doit(skb, nlh, extack, tb, device,
> + port);
> + else if (tb[RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_STAT_HWCOUNTER_DYNAMIC])
> + ret = nldev_stat_set_counter_dynamic_doit(tb, device, port);
> + else
> ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto end;
> - }
I missed this before.. Why is this exclusive?
If userspace sends both inputs then both should be set.
And shouldn't this reject NL attributes it doesn't support - eg
shouldn't this have a stat_set policy to check that?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists