linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: drop obsolete ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a30pdkERK2CREDmpVDtL9+mVBU3iok8DkNoayOTSE9yFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Oct 2021 15:14:21 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: drop obsolete ARCH_* configs

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 12:24 PM Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> On 2021/10/7 18:08, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 05:42:46PM +0800, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> >> On 2021/8/23 21:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> On 21/08/2021 05:05, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> >>>> Per commit 4a9a1a5602d8 ("arm64: socfpga: merge Agilex and N5X into
> >>>> ARCH_INTEL_SOCFPGA") and commit 89d4f98ae90d ("ARM: remove zte zx
> >>>> platform"), they can be dropped from defconfig now.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> >>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 ---
> >>>>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> >>
> >> I have no idea about which tree should this patch go via, so a gentle
> >> ping here. I've verified that this can still be applied cleanly on top
> >> of today's -next.
> >
> > Usually defconfig changes go in via the arm-soc tree rather than the
> > arm64 one.
>
> Thanks for the pointer!
>
> [+ soc@...nel.org]

Applied to the arm/defconfig branch for 5.16, thanks!

        Arnd