[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211007144646.GL12712@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 16:46:46 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@...ernel.net>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 06/10] ovl: implement overlayfs' ->write_inode
operation
On Thu 07-10-21 15:34:19, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 at 15:10, Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@...ernel.net> wrote:
> > > However that wasn't what I was asking about. AFAICS ->write_inode()
> > > won't start write back for dirty pages. Maybe I'm missing something,
> > > but there it looks as if nothing will actually trigger writeback for
> > > dirty pages in upper inode.
> > >
> >
> > Actually, page writeback on upper inode will be triggered by overlayfs ->writepages and
> > overlayfs' ->writepages will be called by vfs writeback function (i.e writeback_sb_inodes).
>
> Right.
>
> But wouldn't it be simpler to do this from ->write_inode()?
You could but then you'd have to make sure you have I_DIRTY_SYNC always set
when I_DIRTY_PAGES is set on the upper inode so that your ->write_inode()
callback gets called. Overall I agree the logic would be probably simpler.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists