[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YV8WsQb9H7+CaLjP@ripper>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 08:48:01 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] clk: qcom: dispcc-sm8250: stop using mmcx
regulator
On Sun 29 Aug 08:47 PDT 2021, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Now as the common qcom clock controller code has been taught about power
> domains, stop mentioning mmcx supply as a way to power up the clock
> controller's gdsc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Once we merge these, I expect that the boards will start crashing if
the kernel is booted using an existing DTB?
Is it okay to just merge the first 6 patches in the series now and
postpone these two until we've had the dts change sitting for a while?
Regards,
Bjorn
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c
> index 108dd1249b6a..cf0bb12eb6e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c
> @@ -1129,7 +1129,6 @@ static struct gdsc mdss_gdsc = {
> },
> .pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_ON,
> .flags = HW_CTRL,
> - .supply = "mmcx",
> };
>
> static struct clk_regmap *disp_cc_sm8250_clocks[] = {
> --
> 2.33.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists