[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHbLzko=jJYs3Tx_up9zPPtw37tDZys07A2UVtHjEokR6-Gteg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 19:49:51 -0700
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 2/5] mm: filemap: check if THP has hwpoisoned subpage
for PMD page fault
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 1:18 PM Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 02:53:08PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
> > + /* Compound pages. Stored in first tail page's flags */
> > + PG_has_hwpoisoned = PG_mappedtodisk,
> > +#endif
>
> Sorry one more comment I missed: would PG_hwpoisoned_subpage better? It's just
> that "has_hwpoison" can be directly read as "this page has been hwpoisoned",
> which sounds too close to PG_hwpoisoned. No strong opinion either. Thanks,
TBH, I don't see too much difference IMHO. Someone may interpret it to
"this" subpage is hwpoisoned rather than at least one subpage of THP
is hwpoisoned.
>
> --
> Peter Xu
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists