lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu,  7 Oct 2021 09:56:27 -0700
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Paul A . Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@...il.com>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
        Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
        ToastC <mrtoastcheng@...il.com>,
        Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
        Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Fabian Hemmer <copy@...y.sh>,
        Alexander Antonov <alexander.antonov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Nicholas Fraser <nfraser@...eweavers.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Denys Zagorui <dzagorui@...co.com>,
        Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@...o.com>,
        Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/21] tools lib: Add list_sort.

Add list_sort.[ch] from the main kernel tree. The linux/bug.h #include
is removed due to conflicting definitions. Add check-headers and modify
perf build accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
---
 tools/include/linux/list_sort.h |  14 ++
 tools/lib/list_sort.c           | 252 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/check-headers.sh     |   2 +
 tools/perf/util/Build           |   5 +
 4 files changed, 273 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/include/linux/list_sort.h
 create mode 100644 tools/lib/list_sort.c

diff --git a/tools/include/linux/list_sort.h b/tools/include/linux/list_sort.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..453105f74e05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/include/linux/list_sort.h
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _LINUX_LIST_SORT_H
+#define _LINUX_LIST_SORT_H
+
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+struct list_head;
+
+typedef int __attribute__((nonnull(2,3))) (*list_cmp_func_t)(void *,
+		const struct list_head *, const struct list_head *);
+
+__attribute__((nonnull(2,3)))
+void list_sort(void *priv, struct list_head *head, list_cmp_func_t cmp);
+#endif
diff --git a/tools/lib/list_sort.c b/tools/lib/list_sort.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..10c067e3a8d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/lib/list_sort.c
@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/list_sort.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
+
+/*
+ * Returns a list organized in an intermediate format suited
+ * to chaining of merge() calls: null-terminated, no reserved or
+ * sentinel head node, "prev" links not maintained.
+ */
+__attribute__((nonnull(2,3,4)))
+static struct list_head *merge(void *priv, list_cmp_func_t cmp,
+				struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b)
+{
+	struct list_head *head, **tail = &head;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		/* if equal, take 'a' -- important for sort stability */
+		if (cmp(priv, a, b) <= 0) {
+			*tail = a;
+			tail = &a->next;
+			a = a->next;
+			if (!a) {
+				*tail = b;
+				break;
+			}
+		} else {
+			*tail = b;
+			tail = &b->next;
+			b = b->next;
+			if (!b) {
+				*tail = a;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+	return head;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Combine final list merge with restoration of standard doubly-linked
+ * list structure.  This approach duplicates code from merge(), but
+ * runs faster than the tidier alternatives of either a separate final
+ * prev-link restoration pass, or maintaining the prev links
+ * throughout.
+ */
+__attribute__((nonnull(2,3,4,5)))
+static void merge_final(void *priv, list_cmp_func_t cmp, struct list_head *head,
+			struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b)
+{
+	struct list_head *tail = head;
+	u8 count = 0;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		/* if equal, take 'a' -- important for sort stability */
+		if (cmp(priv, a, b) <= 0) {
+			tail->next = a;
+			a->prev = tail;
+			tail = a;
+			a = a->next;
+			if (!a)
+				break;
+		} else {
+			tail->next = b;
+			b->prev = tail;
+			tail = b;
+			b = b->next;
+			if (!b) {
+				b = a;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* Finish linking remainder of list b on to tail */
+	tail->next = b;
+	do {
+		/*
+		 * If the merge is highly unbalanced (e.g. the input is
+		 * already sorted), this loop may run many iterations.
+		 * Continue callbacks to the client even though no
+		 * element comparison is needed, so the client's cmp()
+		 * routine can invoke cond_resched() periodically.
+		 */
+		if (unlikely(!++count))
+			cmp(priv, b, b);
+		b->prev = tail;
+		tail = b;
+		b = b->next;
+	} while (b);
+
+	/* And the final links to make a circular doubly-linked list */
+	tail->next = head;
+	head->prev = tail;
+}
+
+/**
+ * list_sort - sort a list
+ * @priv: private data, opaque to list_sort(), passed to @cmp
+ * @head: the list to sort
+ * @cmp: the elements comparison function
+ *
+ * The comparison function @cmp must return > 0 if @a should sort after
+ * @b ("@a > @b" if you want an ascending sort), and <= 0 if @a should
+ * sort before @b *or* their original order should be preserved.  It is
+ * always called with the element that came first in the input in @a,
+ * and list_sort is a stable sort, so it is not necessary to distinguish
+ * the @a < @b and @a == @b cases.
+ *
+ * This is compatible with two styles of @cmp function:
+ * - The traditional style which returns <0 / =0 / >0, or
+ * - Returning a boolean 0/1.
+ * The latter offers a chance to save a few cycles in the comparison
+ * (which is used by e.g. plug_ctx_cmp() in block/blk-mq.c).
+ *
+ * A good way to write a multi-word comparison is::
+ *
+ *	if (a->high != b->high)
+ *		return a->high > b->high;
+ *	if (a->middle != b->middle)
+ *		return a->middle > b->middle;
+ *	return a->low > b->low;
+ *
+ *
+ * This mergesort is as eager as possible while always performing at least
+ * 2:1 balanced merges.  Given two pending sublists of size 2^k, they are
+ * merged to a size-2^(k+1) list as soon as we have 2^k following elements.
+ *
+ * Thus, it will avoid cache thrashing as long as 3*2^k elements can
+ * fit into the cache.  Not quite as good as a fully-eager bottom-up
+ * mergesort, but it does use 0.2*n fewer comparisons, so is faster in
+ * the common case that everything fits into L1.
+ *
+ *
+ * The merging is controlled by "count", the number of elements in the
+ * pending lists.  This is beautifully simple code, but rather subtle.
+ *
+ * Each time we increment "count", we set one bit (bit k) and clear
+ * bits k-1 .. 0.  Each time this happens (except the very first time
+ * for each bit, when count increments to 2^k), we merge two lists of
+ * size 2^k into one list of size 2^(k+1).
+ *
+ * This merge happens exactly when the count reaches an odd multiple of
+ * 2^k, which is when we have 2^k elements pending in smaller lists,
+ * so it's safe to merge away two lists of size 2^k.
+ *
+ * After this happens twice, we have created two lists of size 2^(k+1),
+ * which will be merged into a list of size 2^(k+2) before we create
+ * a third list of size 2^(k+1), so there are never more than two pending.
+ *
+ * The number of pending lists of size 2^k is determined by the
+ * state of bit k of "count" plus two extra pieces of information:
+ *
+ * - The state of bit k-1 (when k == 0, consider bit -1 always set), and
+ * - Whether the higher-order bits are zero or non-zero (i.e.
+ *   is count >= 2^(k+1)).
+ *
+ * There are six states we distinguish.  "x" represents some arbitrary
+ * bits, and "y" represents some arbitrary non-zero bits:
+ * 0:  00x: 0 pending of size 2^k;           x pending of sizes < 2^k
+ * 1:  01x: 0 pending of size 2^k; 2^(k-1) + x pending of sizes < 2^k
+ * 2: x10x: 0 pending of size 2^k; 2^k     + x pending of sizes < 2^k
+ * 3: x11x: 1 pending of size 2^k; 2^(k-1) + x pending of sizes < 2^k
+ * 4: y00x: 1 pending of size 2^k; 2^k     + x pending of sizes < 2^k
+ * 5: y01x: 2 pending of size 2^k; 2^(k-1) + x pending of sizes < 2^k
+ * (merge and loop back to state 2)
+ *
+ * We gain lists of size 2^k in the 2->3 and 4->5 transitions (because
+ * bit k-1 is set while the more significant bits are non-zero) and
+ * merge them away in the 5->2 transition.  Note in particular that just
+ * before the 5->2 transition, all lower-order bits are 11 (state 3),
+ * so there is one list of each smaller size.
+ *
+ * When we reach the end of the input, we merge all the pending
+ * lists, from smallest to largest.  If you work through cases 2 to
+ * 5 above, you can see that the number of elements we merge with a list
+ * of size 2^k varies from 2^(k-1) (cases 3 and 5 when x == 0) to
+ * 2^(k+1) - 1 (second merge of case 5 when x == 2^(k-1) - 1).
+ */
+__attribute__((nonnull(2,3)))
+void list_sort(void *priv, struct list_head *head, list_cmp_func_t cmp)
+{
+	struct list_head *list = head->next, *pending = NULL;
+	size_t count = 0;	/* Count of pending */
+
+	if (list == head->prev)	/* Zero or one elements */
+		return;
+
+	/* Convert to a null-terminated singly-linked list. */
+	head->prev->next = NULL;
+
+	/*
+	 * Data structure invariants:
+	 * - All lists are singly linked and null-terminated; prev
+	 *   pointers are not maintained.
+	 * - pending is a prev-linked "list of lists" of sorted
+	 *   sublists awaiting further merging.
+	 * - Each of the sorted sublists is power-of-two in size.
+	 * - Sublists are sorted by size and age, smallest & newest at front.
+	 * - There are zero to two sublists of each size.
+	 * - A pair of pending sublists are merged as soon as the number
+	 *   of following pending elements equals their size (i.e.
+	 *   each time count reaches an odd multiple of that size).
+	 *   That ensures each later final merge will be at worst 2:1.
+	 * - Each round consists of:
+	 *   - Merging the two sublists selected by the highest bit
+	 *     which flips when count is incremented, and
+	 *   - Adding an element from the input as a size-1 sublist.
+	 */
+	do {
+		size_t bits;
+		struct list_head **tail = &pending;
+
+		/* Find the least-significant clear bit in count */
+		for (bits = count; bits & 1; bits >>= 1)
+			tail = &(*tail)->prev;
+		/* Do the indicated merge */
+		if (likely(bits)) {
+			struct list_head *a = *tail, *b = a->prev;
+
+			a = merge(priv, cmp, b, a);
+			/* Install the merged result in place of the inputs */
+			a->prev = b->prev;
+			*tail = a;
+		}
+
+		/* Move one element from input list to pending */
+		list->prev = pending;
+		pending = list;
+		list = list->next;
+		pending->next = NULL;
+		count++;
+	} while (list);
+
+	/* End of input; merge together all the pending lists. */
+	list = pending;
+	pending = pending->prev;
+	for (;;) {
+		struct list_head *next = pending->prev;
+
+		if (!next)
+			break;
+		list = merge(priv, cmp, pending, list);
+		pending = next;
+	}
+	/* The final merge, rebuilding prev links */
+	merge_final(priv, cmp, head, pending, list);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(list_sort);
diff --git a/tools/perf/check-headers.sh b/tools/perf/check-headers.sh
index f1e46277e822..30ecf3a0f68b 100755
--- a/tools/perf/check-headers.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/check-headers.sh
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ include/vdso/bits.h
 include/linux/const.h
 include/vdso/const.h
 include/linux/hash.h
+include/linux/list-sort.h
 include/uapi/linux/hw_breakpoint.h
 arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h
 arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h
@@ -150,6 +151,7 @@ check include/uapi/linux/mman.h       '-I "^#include <\(uapi/\)*asm/mman.h>"'
 check include/linux/build_bug.h       '-I "^#\(ifndef\|endif\)\( \/\/\)* static_assert$"'
 check include/linux/ctype.h	      '-I "isdigit("'
 check lib/ctype.c		      '-I "^EXPORT_SYMBOL" -I "^#include <linux/export.h>" -B'
+check lib/list_sort.c		      '-I "^#include <linux/bug.h>"'
 
 # diff non-symmetric files
 check_2 tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
index f2914d5bed6e..15b2366ad384 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ perf-y += expr.o
 perf-y += branch.o
 perf-y += mem2node.o
 perf-y += clockid.o
+perf-y += list_sort.o
 
 perf-$(CONFIG_LIBBPF) += bpf-loader.o
 perf-$(CONFIG_LIBBPF) += bpf_map.o
@@ -315,3 +316,7 @@ $(OUTPUT)util/hweight.o: ../lib/hweight.c FORCE
 $(OUTPUT)util/vsprintf.o: ../lib/vsprintf.c FORCE
 	$(call rule_mkdir)
 	$(call if_changed_dep,cc_o_c)
+
+$(OUTPUT)util/list_sort.o: ../lib/list_sort.c FORCE
+	$(call rule_mkdir)
+	$(call if_changed_dep,cc_o_c)
-- 
2.33.0.882.g93a45727a2-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ