linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 0/3] Add trusted_for(2) (was O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4c4bbd74-0599-fed5-0340-eff197bafeb1@digikod.net>
Date:   Thu, 7 Oct 2021 20:29:31 +0200
From:   Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     bauen1 <j2468h@...glemail.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        arnd@...db.de, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
        christian.brauner@...ntu.com, christian@...hon.org, corbet@....net,
        cyphar@...har.com, deven.desai@...ux.microsoft.com,
        dvyukov@...gle.com, ebiggers@...nel.org, ericchiang@...gle.com,
        fweimer@...hat.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org, jack@...e.cz,
        jannh@...gle.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, luto@...nel.org,
        madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com, mjg59@...gle.com,
        mszeredi@...hat.com, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
        nramas@...ux.microsoft.com, philippe.trebuchet@....gouv.fr,
        scottsh@...rosoft.com, sean.j.christopherson@...el.com,
        sgrubb@...hat.com, shuah@...nel.org, steve.dower@...hon.org,
        thibaut.sautereau@...p-os.org, vincent.strubel@....gouv.fr,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, willy@...radead.org, zohar@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/3] Add trusted_for(2) (was O_MAYEXEC)


On 07/10/2021 00:03, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 07:15:42PM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> There was no new reviews, probably because the FS maintainers were busy,
>> and I was focused on Landlock (which is now in -next), but I plan to
>> send a new patch series for trusted_for(2) soon.
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Did this ever happen? It looks like it's in good shape, and I think it's
> a nice building block for userspace to have. Are you able to rebase and
> re-send this?

I just sent it:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211007182321.872075-1-mic@digikod.net/

Some Signed-off-by would be appreciated. :)

> 
> I've tended to aim these things at akpm if Al gets busy. (And since
> you've had past review from Al, that should be hopefully sufficient.)
> 
> Thanks for chasing this!
> 
> -Kees
>