[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3fb354d1-bdc1-8aa2-aa90-4fd92e9a2e9a@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 18:39:32 +0100
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_sdei: pass sdei_api_event_register right
parameters
Hello!
(sorry for the delayed response)
On 10/09/2021 05:01, Liguang Zhang wrote:
> Function _local_event_enable is used for private sdei event
> registeration called by sdei_event_register. We should pass
(registration)
> sdei_api_event_register right flag and mpidr parameters, otherwise atf
> may trigger assert errors.
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
> index a7e762c352f9..0736752dadde 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_sdei.c
> @@ -558,14 +558,16 @@ static int sdei_api_event_register(u32 event_num, unsigned long entry_point,
> static void _local_event_register(void *data)
> {
> int err;
> + u64 mpidr;
> struct sdei_registered_event *reg;
> struct sdei_crosscall_args *arg = data;
>
> WARN_ON(preemptible());
>
> + mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr();
> reg = per_cpu_ptr(arg->event->private_registered, smp_processor_id());
> err = sdei_api_event_register(arg->event->event_num, sdei_entry_point,
> - reg, 0, 0);
> + reg, SDEI_EVENT_REGISTER_RM_PE, mpidr);
Hmmm, this looks like a bug in TFA.
5.1.2.2 "Parameters" of DEN 0054B has:
| Routing mode is valid only for a shared event. For a private event, the routing mode is
| ignored.
Worse, the mpidr field has:
| Currently the format is defined only when the selected routing mode is RM_PE.
Over in trusted firmware land:
https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git/tree/services/std_svc/sdei/sdei_main.c?h=v2.5#n361
| static int64_t sdei_event_register(int ev_num,
| uint64_t ep,
| uint64_t arg,
| uint64_t flags,
| uint64_t mpidr)
| {
| /* Private events always target the PE */
| if (is_event_private(map))
| flags = SDEI_REGF_RM_PE;
It looks like this re-uses the 'caller specified the routing' code, but didn't update the
mpidr.
You mention TFA takes an assert failure, I assume that brings the machine down.
(Presumably you don't have a CPU with an affinity of zero.)
Does this mean no-one relies on this, and we can fix the firmware?
(I'll go report this to the relevant folk)
Thanks!
James
>
> sdei_cross_call_return(arg, err);
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists