lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 8 Oct 2021 19:33:28 +0000
From:   Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Boqun Feng <Boqun.Feng@...rosoft.com>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        "Krzysztof WilczyƄski" <kw@...ux.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "\"H. Peter Anvin\"" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: hv: Support for Hyper-V vPCI
 for ARM64

On Friday, October 8, 2021 12:23 PM
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:

> Subject line should start with a verb telling us what this does.
> 
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 05:21:29PM +0000, Sunil Muthuswamy wrote:
> > This patch adds support for Hyper-V vPCI by adding a PCI MSI
> > IRQ domain specific to Hyper-V that is based on SPIs. The IRQ
> > domain parents itself to the arch GIC IRQ domain for basic
> > vector management.
> 
> Same "This patch adds ..." comment as for patch 1/2.  You could say
> something like "Add support ...".  It would also be good to include
> "ARM64" since I think that's the point here.
> 
Point noted, thanks.

> > +	/* Delivery mode: Fixed */
> > +	*delivery_mode = 0;
> 
> Why not APIC_DELIVERY_MODE_FIXED as you used for x86?
> 
That is because 'APIC_DELIVERY_MODE_FIXED' is defined under
'arch/x86' and I didn't see an equivalent definition for ARM64.

- Sunil

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ