linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] ASoC: qcom: dt-bindings: Add compatible names for lpass sc7280 digital codecs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 Oct 2021 16:58:13 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, plai@...eaurora.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, judyhsiao@...omium.org,
        broonie@...nel.org, tiwai@...e.com, rohitkr@...eaurora.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
        bgoswami@...eaurora.org, perex@...ex.cz,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        swboyd@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] ASoC: qcom: dt-bindings: Add compatible names for
 lpass sc7280 digital codecs

On Fri, 08 Oct 2021 19:39:01 +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
> Update compatible names in va, wsa, rx and tx macro codes for lpass sc7280
> 
> Signed-off-by: Venkata Prasad Potturu <potturu@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,lpass-rx-macro.yaml  | 4 +++-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,lpass-tx-macro.yaml  | 4 +++-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,lpass-va-macro.yaml  | 4 +++-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,lpass-wsa-macro.yaml | 4 +++-
>  4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 


Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.