[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72d26b0622538bdfda4e64519d34088e8c21656a.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 14:19:17 +0800
From: Kewei Xu <kewei.xu@...iatek.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC: <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, <leilk.liu@...iatek.com>,
<qii.wang@...iatek.com>, <liguo.zhang@...iatek.com>,
<caiyu.chen@...iatek.com>, <ot_daolong.zhu@...iatek.com>,
<yuhan.wei@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] i2c: mediatek: Reset the handshake signal
between i2c and dma
On Sat, 2021-10-02 at 08:30 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > +#define I2C_CLR_DEBUGCTR 0x0000
>
> Hmm, I don't think that a macro to clear a register helps
> readability...
>
> > + mtk_i2c_writew(i2c, I2C_CLR_DEBUGCTR,
> > OFFSET_DEBUGCTRL);
>
> ..
>
> + mtk_i2c_writew(i2c, 0, OFFSET_DEBUGCTRL);
>
> looks good to me. Anyhow, it is not a big issue. Let me know if you
> want
> to change it or keep it.
>
OK, I will use 0x00 instead of macro on V8 version,Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists