linux-kernel - RE: [PATCHv3] clk:aspeed:Fix AST2600 hpll calculate formula

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 8 Oct 2021 07:32:14 +0000
From:   Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>
To:     Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
CC:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv3] clk:aspeed:Fix AST2600 hpll calculate formula

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 12:06 PM
> To: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>; Stephen Boyd
> <sboyd@...nel.org>; Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>;
> linux-clk@...r.kernel.org; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] clk:aspeed:Fix AST2600 hpll calculate formula
> 
> On Sat, 25 Sept 2021 at 02:24, Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>
> wrote:
> >
> 
> A few notes on process:
> 
> > v2 -> v3: change else than if to directly else if
> > v1 -> v2: add Fixes commit hash
> 
> As this is normally information for reviewers to know what you've changed
> since the last version, we normally put this below the --- in the patch, which
> means it is not included in the commit message.
> 
> Also we put a space between the PATCH and v3 in the subject. If you use the
> tools, it will generate this for you:
> 
> git format-patch -v3 -1 --to=...
> 
> >
> > AST2600 HPLL calculate formula [SCU200] HPLL Numerator(M): have fixed
> > value depend on SCU strap.
> > M = SCU500[10] ? 0x5F : SCU500[8] ? 0xBF : SCU200[12:0]
> 
> I recommend adding to the commit message the text from my first review:
> 
> From the datasheet:
> 
> CPU frequency selection
> 000 1.2GHz
> 001 1.6GHz
> 010 1.2GHz
> 011 1.6GHz
> 100 800MHz
> 101 800MHz
> 110 800MHz
> 111 800MHz
> 
> So when the system is running at 800MHz or 1.6GHz, the value for the
> numerator (m) in SCU204 is incorrect, and must be overridden.

Yes, SCU204 will be overridden by chip design.
Let me clarify m is in SCU200[12:0] not SCU204. SCU204 is NB not related with freq.

> 
> >
> > if SCU500[10] = 1, M=0x5F.
> > else if SCU500[10]=0 & SCU500[8]=1, M=0xBF.
> > others (SCU510[10]=0 and SCU510[8]=0)
> > depend on SCU200[12:0] (default 0x8F) register setting.
> >
> > HPLL Denumerator (N) =  SCU200[18:13] (default 0x2)
> > HPLL Divider (P)         =      SCU200[22:19] (default 0x0)
> >
> > Fixes: d3d04f6c330a ("clk: Add support for AST2600 SoC")
> > Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/clk-ast2600.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-ast2600.c b/drivers/clk/clk-ast2600.c
> > index 085d0a18b2b6..d30188355aaf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-ast2600.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-ast2600.c
> > @@ -169,6 +169,32 @@ static const struct clk_div_table
> > ast2600_div_table[] = {  };
> >
> >  /* For hpll/dpll/epll/mpll */
> > +static struct clk_hw *ast2600_calc_hpll(const char *name, u32 val) {
> > +       unsigned int mult, div;
> > +       u32 hwstrap = readl(scu_g6_base + ASPEED_G6_STRAP1);
> > +
> > +       if (val & BIT(24)) {
> > +               /* Pass through mode */
> > +               mult = div = 1;
> > +       } else {
> > +               /* F = 25Mhz * [(M + 2) / (n + 1)] / (p + 1) */
> > +               u32 m = val  & 0x1fff;
> > +               u32 n = (val >> 13) & 0x3f;
> > +               u32 p = (val >> 19) & 0xf;
> > +
> 
> Add a comment:
> 
> /* If the CPU is running at 800Mhz. */
> 
> > +               if (hwstrap & BIT(10))
> > +                       m = 0x5F;
> 
> /* If the CPU is running at 1600Mhz. */
> 
> > +               else if (hwstrap & BIT(8))
> > +                       m = 0xBF;
> 
> 
> Or you could copy what I suggested in the first patch, and write it like this,
> which I think is clear:
> 
> ff (hwstrap & BIT(10)) {
>     /* CPU running at 800MHz */
>    m = 95;
> } else if (hwstrap & BIT(10)) {
>     /* CPU running at 1.6GHz */
>   m  = 191;
> } else {
>    /* CPU running at 1.2Ghz */
>   m = val  & 0x1fff;
> }

How about following 

ff (hwstrap & BIT(10)) {
    /* CPU running at 800MHz */
    m = 0x5F;
} else if (hwstrap & BIT(10)) {
    /* CPU running at 1.6GHz */
    m = 0xBF;
} else {
   /* CPU running at 1.2Ghz */
   m = val  & 0x1fff;
}

> 
> Please send a v4 with some more comments so we don't need to go back to
> the datasheet each time we read this code. Feel free to cut/paste my
> suggestion and use it as-is.
> 
Thanks a lot.

> Cheers,
> 
> Joel
> 
> > +
> > +               mult = (m + 1) / (n + 1);
> > +               div = (p + 1);
> > +       }
> > +       return clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(NULL, name, "clkin", 0,
> > +                       mult, div);
> > +};
> > +
> >  static struct clk_hw *ast2600_calc_pll(const char *name, u32 val)  {
> >         unsigned int mult, div;
> > @@ -716,7 +742,7 @@ static void __init aspeed_g6_cc(struct regmap
> *map)
> >          * and we assume that it is enabled
> >          */
> >         regmap_read(map, ASPEED_HPLL_PARAM, &val);
> > -       aspeed_g6_clk_data->hws[ASPEED_CLK_HPLL] =
> ast2600_calc_pll("hpll", val);
> > +       aspeed_g6_clk_data->hws[ASPEED_CLK_HPLL] =
> > + ast2600_calc_hpll("hpll", val);
> >
> >         regmap_read(map, ASPEED_MPLL_PARAM, &val);
> >         aspeed_g6_clk_data->hws[ASPEED_CLK_MPLL] =
> ast2600_calc_pll("mpll", val);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >