[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2h=DS=-xKc059YQg=K400kRUHHpJ=xyDPRW40D3ZsaTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 10:28:43 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the asm-generic tree
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 4:17 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/riscv/Kconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> b63dc8f2b02c ("firmware: include drivers/firmware/Kconfig unconditionally")
>
> from the asm-generic tree and commit:
>
> 99cdc6c18c2d ("RISC-V: Add initial skeletal KVM support")
>
> from the kvm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Looks good, thanks!
I'm planning to send the commit in the asm-generic tree to mainline
today, so it will then be a conflict against 5.15.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists