[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1633687054-18865-3-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 02:57:34 -0700
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: LAPIC: Optimize PMI delivering overhead
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
The overhead of kvm_vcpu_kick() is huge since expensive rcu/memory
barrier etc operations in rcuwait_wake_up(). It is worse when local
delivery since the vCPU is scheduled and we still suffer from this.
We can observe 12us+ for kvm_vcpu_kick() in kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi()
path by ftrace before the patch and 6us+ after the optimization.
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
index 76fb00921203..ec6997187c6d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
@@ -1120,7 +1120,8 @@ static int __apic_accept_irq(struct kvm_lapic *apic, int delivery_mode,
case APIC_DM_NMI:
result = 1;
kvm_inject_nmi(vcpu);
- kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
+ if (vcpu != kvm_get_running_vcpu())
+ kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
break;
case APIC_DM_INIT:
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists