linux-kernel - Re: [musl] Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v7 8/9] ALSA: add new 32-bit layout for snd_pcm_mmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <s5ho87z7mxg.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date:   Fri, 08 Oct 2021 13:53:15 +0200
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     musl@...ts.openwall.com, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Michael Forney <mforney@...rney.org>,
        ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [musl] Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v7 8/9] ALSA: add new 32-bit layout for snd_pcm_mmap_status/control

On Fri, 08 Oct 2021 13:45:45 +0200,
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 1:11 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 Oct 2021 11:24:39 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > >
> > > I've tried to understand this part of musl's convert_ioctl_struct(), but I just
> > > can't figure out whether it does the conversion based the on the layout that
> > > is currently used in the kernel, or based on the layout we should have been
> > > using, and would use with the above fix. Rich, can you help me here?
> >
> > So, at this moment, I'm not sure whether we should correct the struct
> > at all.  This will lead to yet more breakage, and basically the struct
> > itself *works* -- the only bug is in 32bit compat handling in the
> > kernel (again).
> 
> I'm still unsure if the musl fallback code is correct or not.

We need to verify the current behavior in anyway...

> > The below is a revised kernel patch (again untested), just correcting
> > the behavior of 32bit compat mode.  32bit apps on 32bit kernel work
> > fine as is, as well as 64bit apps on 64bit kernel.
> 
> Right, this should cover all cases of the ioctl itself misbehaving.
> In addition, we still need to disallow the mmap() interface on compat
> kernels then. Strictly speaking, we could allow the snd_pcm_mmap_status
> but not snd_pcm_mmap_control to be mapped, but I'm not sure if
> that's better than disallowing both.

IIRC, the compat mmap is already disallowed even for the
SNDRV_PCM_MMAP_OFFSET_CONTROL_NEW (in pcm_control_mmap_allowed()), so
no need to change around that.


thanks,

Takashi