lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 8 Oct 2021 11:29:10 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@...il.com>
Cc:     Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 01/37] libperf cpumap: improve idx function

Em Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 11:19:07AM +0200, Riccardo Mancini escreveu:
> >From commit 7074674e7338863e ("perf cpumap: Maintain cpumaps ordered
> and without dups"), perf_cpu_map elements are sorted in ascending order.
> 
> This patch improves the perf_cpu_map__idx function by using a binary
> search.

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

 
> Signed-off-by: Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@...il.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c b/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c
> index ca0215047c326af4..fb633272be3aaed9 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c
> @@ -265,11 +265,18 @@ bool perf_cpu_map__empty(const struct perf_cpu_map *map)
>  
>  int perf_cpu_map__idx(struct perf_cpu_map *cpus, int cpu)
>  {
> -	int i;
> +	int low = 0, high = cpus->nr, idx, cpu_at_idx;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < cpus->nr; ++i) {
> -		if (cpus->map[i] == cpu)
> -			return i;
> +	while (low < high) {
> +		idx = (low + high) / 2;
> +		cpu_at_idx = cpus->map[idx];
> +
> +		if (cpu_at_idx == cpu)
> +			return idx;
> +		else if (cpu_at_idx > cpu)
> +			high = idx;
> +		else
> +			low = idx+1;
>  	}
>  
>  	return -1;
> -- 
> 2.31.1

-- 

- Arnaldo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists