lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 8 Oct 2021 22:55:57 +0800
From:   Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
To:     "yongqiang.niu" <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>,
        Dennis YC Hsieh <dennis-yc.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2, 1/1] mailbox: cmdq: add instruction time-out interrupt support

Hi, Yongqiang:

yongqiang.niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com> 於 2021年10月8日 週五 上午9:49寫道:
>
> On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 07:41 +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > Hi, Yongqiang:
> >
> > Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com> 於 2021年9月30日 週四 下午9:18寫道:
> > >
> > > add time-out cycle setting to make sure time-out interrupt irq
> > > will happened when instruction time-out for wait and poll
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> > > b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> > > index 64175a893312..197b03222f94 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> > > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> > >  #define CMDQ_THR_END_ADDR              0x24
> > >  #define CMDQ_THR_WAIT_TOKEN            0x30
> > >  #define CMDQ_THR_PRIORITY              0x40
> > > +#define CMDQ_THR_INSTN_TIMEOUT_CYCLES  0x50
> > >
> > >  #define GCE_GCTL_VALUE                 0x48
> > >
> > > @@ -54,6 +55,15 @@
> > >  #define CMDQ_JUMP_BY_OFFSET            0x10000000
> > >  #define CMDQ_JUMP_BY_PA                        0x10000001
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * instruction time-out
> > > + * cycles to issue instruction time-out interrupt for wait and
> > > poll instructions
> > > + * GCE axi_clock 156MHz
> > > + * 1 cycle = 6.41ns
> > > + * instruction time out 2^22*2*6.41ns = 53ms
> >
> > For different clients, the timeout value would be different, and each
> > client could use timer to detect timeout, so it's not necessary to
> > enable timeout in cmdq driver.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Chun-Kuang.
>
> if we do not set cmdq hardware timeout, this condition will never
> happen
> cmdq_thread_irq_handler
> if (irq_flag & CMDQ_THR_IRQ_ERROR)
>                 err = true;
>
> and no error callback
> else if (err) {
>                         cmdq_task_exec_done(task, -ENOEXEC);
>                         cmdq_task_handle_error(curr_task);
>                         kfree(task);
>                 }
> the client will never received the error callback, cmdq hardware will
> poll the event for ever and no report timeout

I think there are two way to implement the timeout mechanism. The
first way is to use the GCE hardware to detect timeout. The second way
is that client driver use timer to detect timeout, when it's timeout,
use mbox_flush() to clean up the packets in mtk cmdq driver, and
remove the error handle in irq handler.
If you think the first way is better, I think you should pass the
timeout value from client driver to cmdq driver because each client
driver has different timeout value. And the GCE clock may be different
in each SoC, so use clk_get_rate() to get the clock frequency for
different SoC.

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

> >
> > > + */
> > > +#define CMDQ_INSTN_TIMEOUT_CYCLES      22
> > > +
> > >  struct cmdq_thread {
> > >         struct mbox_chan        *chan;
> > >         void __iomem            *base;
> > > @@ -376,6 +386,7 @@ static int cmdq_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan
> > > *chan, void *data)
> > >                 writel((task->pa_base + pkt->cmd_buf_size) >> cmdq-
> > > >shift_pa,
> > >                        thread->base + CMDQ_THR_END_ADDR);
> > >
> > > +               writel(CMDQ_INSTN_TIMEOUT_CYCLES, thread->base +
> > > CMDQ_THR_INSTN_TIMEOUT_CYCLES);
> > >                 writel(thread->priority, thread->base +
> > > CMDQ_THR_PRIORITY);
> > >                 writel(CMDQ_THR_IRQ_EN, thread->base +
> > > CMDQ_THR_IRQ_ENABLE);
> > >                 writel(CMDQ_THR_ENABLED, thread->base +
> > > CMDQ_THR_ENABLE_TASK);
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ