[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba01fb13-e1a1-299e-9a7b-ccdeaeef267a@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 10:31:50 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kunit-next tree with the
kunit-fixes tree
On 10/7/21 10:29 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kunit-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
>
> between commit:
>
> d8c23ead708b ("kunit: tool: better handling of quasi-bool args (--json, --raw_output)")
>
> from the kunit-fixes tree and commit:
>
> 6710951ee039 ("kunit: tool: support running each suite/test separately")
>
> from the kunit-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
Thank you for the fixing it up. I will fix this up in the kunit-next once
the kunit-fixes pull request goes out.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists