[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADRPPNSqJJ3RObHLVmpcg71Gz6jXi+Qa3kv-Z2oyBHzv4qcx_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 22:12:13 -0500
From: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] memory: fsl_ifc: populate child devices without
relying on simple-bus
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 12:14 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 07:09:21PM -0500, Li Yang wrote:
> > After we update the binding to not use simple-bus compatible for the
> > controller, we need the driver to populate the child devices explicitly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/memory/fsl_ifc.c | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/memory/fsl_ifc.c b/drivers/memory/fsl_ifc.c
> > index d062c2f8250f..251d713cd50b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/memory/fsl_ifc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/memory/fsl_ifc.c
> > @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ static int fsl_ifc_ctrl_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
> > {
> > struct fsl_ifc_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
> >
> > + of_platform_depopulate(&dev->dev);
> > free_irq(ctrl->nand_irq, ctrl);
> > free_irq(ctrl->irq, ctrl);
> >
> > @@ -285,6 +286,14 @@ static int fsl_ifc_ctrl_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + /* legacy dts may still use "simple-bus" compatible */
> > + if (!of_device_is_compatible(dev->dev.of_node, "simple-bus")) {
> > + ret = of_platform_populate(dev->dev.of_node, NULL, NULL,
> > + &dev->dev);
>
> There's no need to make this conditional. of_platform_populate() is safe
> to call multiple times. If that doesn't work, it's a bug.
I think that it is probably an optimization to avoid re-populate the
bus for legacy device trees. But it might be cleaner to just
re-populate anyway?
Regards,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists