linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi scsi_transport_iscsi.c: fix misuse of %llu in scsi_transport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1054322431.5783331.1633754117686.JavaMail.zimbra@sjtu.edu.cn>
Date:   Sat, 9 Oct 2021 12:35:17 +0800 (CST)
From:   Guo Zhi <qtxuning1999@...u.edu.cn>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>, Chris Leech <cleech@...hat.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        open-iscsi@...glegroups.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi scsi_transport_iscsi.c: fix misuse of %llu in
 scsi_transport_iscsi.c

I will send a V2 patch.

----- 原始邮件 -----
发件人: "Joe Perches" <joe@...ches.com>
收件人: "Guo Zhi" <qtxuning1999@...u.edu.cn>, "Lee Duncan" <lduncan@...e.com>, "Chris Leech" <cleech@...hat.com>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
抄送: open-iscsi@...glegroups.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
发送时间: 星期六, 2021年 10 月 09日 上午 11:14:36
主题: Re: [PATCH] scsi scsi_transport_iscsi.c: fix misuse of %llu in scsi_transport_iscsi.c

On Sat, 2021-10-09 at 11:02 +0800, Guo Zhi wrote:
> Pointers should be printed with %p or %px rather than
> cast to (unsigned long long) and printed with %llu.
> Change %llu to %p to print the pointer into sysfs.
][]
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
[]
> @@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ show_transport_handle(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>  
> 
>  	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>  		return -EACCES;
> -	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%llu\n",
> -		  (unsigned long long)iscsi_handle(priv->iscsi_transport));
> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%p\n",
> +		iscsi_ptr(priv->iscsi_transport));

iscsi_transport is a pointer isn't it?

so why not just

	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%p\n", priv->iscsi_transport);

?