[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211009053747.1694419-12-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 22:37:47 -0700
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>,
VMware Inc <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: Peter H Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 11/11] x86/tdx: Handle CPUID via #VE
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
When running virtualized, the CPUID instruction is handled differently
based on the leaf being accessed. The behavior depends only on the
leaf and applies equally to both kernel/ring-0 and userspace/ring-3
execution of CPUID. Historically, there are two basic classes:
* Leaves handled transparently to the guest
* Leaves handled by the VMM
In a typical guest without TDX, "handled by the VMM" leaves cause a
VMEXIT. TDX replaces these VMEXITs with a #VE exception in the guest.
The guest typically handles the #VE by making a hypercall to the VMM.
The TDX module specification [1], section titled "CPUID Virtualization"
talks about a few more classes of CPUID handling. But, for the purposes
of this patch, the "handled transparently" CPUID leaves are all lumped
together because the guest handling is the same.
[1] - https://software.intel.com/content/dam/develop/external/us/en/documents/tdx-module-1.0-public-spec-v0.931.pdf
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
---
Changes since v9:
* None
Changes since v8:
* Removed zero initialization of struct tdx_hypercall_output in
tdx_handle_cpuid().
* Changed return type of tdx_handle_cpuid() to bool.
Changes since v7:
* None
Changes since v6:
* Fixed commit log as per Dave Hansen comments.
* Added extra comments for _tdx_hypercall() usage.
Changes since v5:
* Fixed commit log as per review comments.
* Removed WARN_ON() in tdx_handle_cpuid().
* Renamed "tdg" prefix with "tdx".
Changes since v4:
* None
Changes since v3:
* None
arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c
index 7c6c84015302..f8f242215dbc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c
@@ -143,6 +143,31 @@ static bool tdx_write_msr_safe(unsigned int msr, unsigned int low,
return ret ? false : true;
}
+static bool tdx_handle_cpuid(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ struct tdx_hypercall_output out;
+
+ /*
+ * Emulate CPUID instruction via hypercall. More info about
+ * ABI can be found in TDX Guest-Host-Communication Interface
+ * (GHCI), section titled "VP.VMCALL<Instruction.CPUID>".
+ */
+ if (_tdx_hypercall(EXIT_REASON_CPUID, regs->ax, regs->cx, 0, 0, &out))
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * As per TDX GHCI CPUID ABI, r12-r15 registers contains contents of
+ * EAX, EBX, ECX, EDX registers after CPUID instruction execution.
+ * So copy the register contents back to pt_regs.
+ */
+ regs->ax = out.r12;
+ regs->bx = out.r13;
+ regs->cx = out.r14;
+ regs->dx = out.r15;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
bool tdx_get_ve_info(struct ve_info *ve)
{
struct tdx_module_output out;
@@ -191,6 +216,9 @@ bool tdx_handle_virtualization_exception(struct pt_regs *regs,
case EXIT_REASON_MSR_WRITE:
ret = tdx_write_msr_safe(regs->cx, regs->ax, regs->dx);
break;
+ case EXIT_REASON_CPUID:
+ ret = tdx_handle_cpuid(regs);
+ break;
default:
pr_warn("Unexpected #VE: %lld\n", ve->exit_reason);
return false;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists