| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 17:37:02 -0700
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
James E J Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter H Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 07/16] x86/kvm: Use bounce buffers for TD guest
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Intel TDX doesn't allow VMM to directly access guest private memory.
Any memory that is required for communication with VMM must be shared
explicitly. The same rule applies for any DMA to and from TDX guest.
All DMA pages had to marked as shared pages. A generic way to achieve
this without any changes to device drivers is to use the SWIOTLB
framework.
This method of handling is similar to AMD SEV. So extend this support
for TDX guest as well. Also since there are some common code between
AMD SEV and TDX guest in mem_encrypt_init(), move it to
mem_encrypt_common.c and call AMD specific init function from it
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
---
Changes since v4:
* Replaced prot_guest_has() with cc_guest_has().
Changes since v3:
* Rebased on top of Tom Lendacky's protected guest
changes (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1468760/)
Changes since v1:
* Removed sme_me_mask check for amd_mem_encrypt_init() in mem_encrypt_init().
arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt_common.h | 3 +++
arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c | 2 ++
arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 5 +----
arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_common.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt_common.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt_common.h
index 697bc40a4e3d..bc90e565bce4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt_common.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt_common.h
@@ -8,11 +8,14 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
bool amd_force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev);
+void __init amd_mem_encrypt_init(void);
#else /* CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT */
static inline bool amd_force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
{
return false;
}
+
+static inline void amd_mem_encrypt_init(void) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT */
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c
index 433f366ca25c..ce8e3019b812 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <asm/insn.h>
#include <asm/insn-eval.h>
#include <linux/sched/signal.h> /* force_sig_fault() */
+#include <linux/swiotlb.h>
/* TDX Module call Leaf IDs */
#define TDX_GET_INFO 1
@@ -577,6 +578,7 @@ void __init tdx_early_init(void)
pv_ops.irq.halt = tdx_halt;
legacy_pic = &null_legacy_pic;
+ swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_FORCE;
cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "tdx:cpu_hotplug",
NULL, tdx_cpu_offline_prepare);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
index 5d7fbed73949..8385bc4565e9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
@@ -438,14 +438,11 @@ static void print_mem_encrypt_feature_info(void)
}
/* Architecture __weak replacement functions */
-void __init mem_encrypt_init(void)
+void __init amd_mem_encrypt_init(void)
{
if (!sme_me_mask)
return;
- /* Call into SWIOTLB to update the SWIOTLB DMA buffers */
- swiotlb_update_mem_attributes();
-
/*
* With SEV, we need to unroll the rep string I/O instructions,
* but SEV-ES supports them through the #VC handler.
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_common.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_common.c
index 119a9056efbb..6fe44c6cb753 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_common.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <asm/mem_encrypt_common.h>
#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
#include <linux/cc_platform.h>
+#include <linux/swiotlb.h>
/* Override for DMA direct allocation check - ARCH_HAS_FORCE_DMA_UNENCRYPTED */
bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
@@ -24,3 +25,16 @@ bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
return false;
}
+
+/* Architecture __weak replacement functions */
+void __init mem_encrypt_init(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * For TDX guest or SEV/SME, call into SWIOTLB to update
+ * the SWIOTLB DMA buffers
+ */
+ if (sme_me_mask || cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT))
+ swiotlb_update_mem_attributes();
+
+ amd_mem_encrypt_init();
+}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists