lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABoTLcTqhoFp0EafC5Asn-nPkkKVeYCROefXHDcQvZs==RijDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 9 Oct 2021 11:03:59 -0400
From:   Oskar Senft <osk@...gle.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] hwmon: (nct7802) Make temperature sensors configurable.

> > Please align continuation lines with "(".
> Oh, even if that would result in a lot of extra lines? Or just start
> the first argument on a new line?

> > space around '-'
> Oh yeah, I'm sorry. Is there a code formatter I should have run? I did
> run "checkpatch.pl", hoping that it would catch those.

> > Unnecessary continuation lines. There are several more of those;
> > I won't comment on it further. Please only use continuation lines if
> > the resulting line length is otherwise > 100 columns.
> Argh, yeah. After refactoring that function, I thought I caught all of
> them, but obviously I didn't. According to [1] we should stay within
> 80 columns (and use tabs that are 8 spaces wide). I assume that still
> applies? The rest of this code follows that rule.

For all of the above: I found that running clang-format within subl
for the new code does what we want. Sorry again for that, I'll start
doing that from now.

Oskar.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ