[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211009180941.20458-1-tao.zhou@linux.dev>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 02:09:41 +0800
From: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@...ux.dev>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Check idle_cpu in select_idle_core/cpu()
In select_idle_core(), the idle core returned may have no cpu
allowed. I think the idle core returned for the task is the one
that can be allowed to run. I insist on this semantics.
In select_idle_cpu(), if select_idle_core() can not find the
idle core, one reason is that the core is not allowed for the
task, but the core itself is idle from the point of
sds->has_idle_cores. I insist on this semantics.
No others, just two additional check.
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index f6a05d9b5443..a44aca5095d3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6213,7 +6213,7 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpu
*idle_cpu = cpu;
}
- if (idle)
+ if (idle && *idle_cpu != -1)
return core;
cpumask_andnot(cpus, cpus, cpu_smt_mask(core));
@@ -6324,7 +6324,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
}
}
- if (has_idle_core)
+ if (has_idle_core && *idle_cpu != -1)
set_idle_cores(target, false);
if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !has_idle_core) {
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists