[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <377b54ef-b9c0-9cfc-ef0c-0187d7c493cc@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:55:37 +0100
From: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
James Clark <James.Clark@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf arm-spe: Implement find_snapshot callback
Hi Leo,
On 06/10/2021 10:51, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 10:35:20AM +0100, German Gomez wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> So simply say, I think the head pointer monotonically increasing is
>>> the right thing to do in Arm SPE driver.
>> I will talk to James about how we can proceed on this.
> Thanks!
I took this offline with James and, though it looks possible to patch
the SPE driver to have a monotonically increasing head pointer in order
to simplify the handling in the perf tool, it could be a breaking change
for users of the perf_event_open syscall that currently rely on the way
it works now.
An alternative way we considered to simplify the patch is to change the
logic inside the find_snapshot callback so that it records the entire
contents of the aux buffer every time.
What do you think?
Many thanks,
German
Powered by blists - more mailing lists