[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2142175-c0f3-c511-4a55-ad22fb732af0@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:44:19 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: nVMX: Track whether changes in L0 require MSR
bitmap for L2 to be rebuilt
On 11/10/21 17:13, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>
>> The changelog kind of covers that, but those details will be completely lost to
>> readers of the code.
> Would it help if we rename 'msr_bitmap_changed' to something?
Yeah, what about 'msr_bitmap_force_recalc'?
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists