linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoc: amd: create platform device for VG machine driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:49:52 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Alexander.Deucher@....com,
        Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com, David.Rhodes@...rus.com,
        wtli@...oton.com, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoc: amd: create platform device for VG machine
 driver

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:17:01AM +0530, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:

>  		pdevinfo[2].res = &adata->res[2];
>  
> +		pdevinfo[3].name = "acp5x_nu8821_cs35l41_mach";
> +		pdevinfo[3].id = 0;
> +		pdevinfo[3].parent = &pci->dev;

This appears to unconditionally assume that any machine with this
hardware is going to have exactly the same CODEC/amp combination - that
seems like it's going to go badly at some point.  Shouldn't there be
some other check that we're instantiating the right machine driver?

BTW your clock appears to be set quite a way into the future (possibly
about 24 hours?) which is confusing things.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)