lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWR5QH1lYqiT1cX+@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:49:52 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Alexander.Deucher@....com,
        Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com, David.Rhodes@...rus.com,
        wtli@...oton.com, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoc: amd: create platform device for VG machine
 driver

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:17:01AM +0530, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:

>  		pdevinfo[2].res = &adata->res[2];
>  
> +		pdevinfo[3].name = "acp5x_nu8821_cs35l41_mach";
> +		pdevinfo[3].id = 0;
> +		pdevinfo[3].parent = &pci->dev;

This appears to unconditionally assume that any machine with this
hardware is going to have exactly the same CODEC/amp combination - that
seems like it's going to go badly at some point.  Shouldn't there be
some other check that we're instantiating the right machine driver?

BTW your clock appears to be set quite a way into the future (possibly
about 24 hours?) which is confusing things.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ