[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c89cdb5-4920-8d01-2051-b64b804db9f6@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 23:22:10 +0100
From: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
To: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
Krzysztof HaĆasa <khalasa@...p.pl>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
Matteo Lisi <matteo.lisi@...icam.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Driver for ON Semi AR0521 camera sensor
Hi Jacopo
On 11/10/2021 15:34, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
>>>> +static int ar0521_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>>>> + struct ar0521_dev *sensor = to_ar0521_dev(sd);
>>>> +
>>>> + v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&sensor->sd);
>>>> + media_entity_cleanup(&sensor->sd.entity);
>>>> + v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&sensor->ctrls.handler);
>>>> + pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
>>>> + pm_runtime_set_suspended(&client->dev);
>>> set_suspended() then disable maybe ?
>> Other drivers seem to do it the above way but I don't know the
>> difference.
> Maybe I'm wrong but calling set_suspend() after pm_runtime() had been
> disabled seems pointless. A minor anyway as it's in the driver's
> remove function.
>
fwiw, the kernel doc [1] for pm_runtime_set_suspended() does say that
it's not valid to call it for devices where runtime PM is still enabled.
[1]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/pm_runtime.h#L510
Powered by blists - more mailing lists