linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] RISC-V: Enable CPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Oct 2021 01:16:42 +0200
From:   Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Sandeep Tripathy <milun.tripathy@...il.com>,
        Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
        Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
        Liush <liush@...winnertech.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
        Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] RISC-V: Enable CPU_IDLE drivers

Hi Anup,

Am Montag, 11. Oktober 2021, 10:18:13 CEST schrieb Anup Patel:
> We force select CPU_PM and provide asm/cpuidle.h so that we can
> use CPU IDLE drivers for Linux RISC-V kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig                |  7 +++++++
>  arch/riscv/configs/defconfig      |  1 +
>  arch/riscv/configs/rv32_defconfig |  1 +
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/cpuidle.h  | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/process.c       |  3 ++-
>  5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 8de2afb460f7..d02f1f5a2431 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ config RISCV
>  	select CLONE_BACKWARDS
>  	select CLINT_TIMER if !MMU
>  	select COMMON_CLK
> +	select CPU_PM if CPU_IDLE
>  	select EDAC_SUPPORT
>  	select GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY if SMP
>  	select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 if !64BIT
> @@ -564,5 +565,11 @@ source "kernel/power/Kconfig"
>  
>  endmenu
>  
> +menu "CPU Power Management"
> +
> +source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig"
> +
> +endmenu
> +
>  source "arch/riscv/kvm/Kconfig"
>  source "drivers/firmware/Kconfig"

another issue, the "arch/riscv/kvm/Kconfig" line above comes from a
commit that is not in the riscv-tree at all but in the kvm-tree [0],
making this patch fail to apply onto riscv/for-next alone.

If you have multiple independent patch series in flight, like shown in
the github branch you references, it might be easier to base each on
top of the relevant branch cleanly and after one gets applied rebase
the other ones.

That way you're not dependent on the others going in first and also
people can test patch series individually without too much hassle.

Thanks
Heiko


[0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git/commit/?h=next&id=99cdc6c18c2d815e940e81b9b477d469bdd41788