[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3JwQP1b0KeLRN0UCMmzFn3+gY2oexYUwGyt2bOqC0P4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:08:44 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: fix ARM_SMMU vs QCOM_SCM compilation
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 6:11 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 at 20:42, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> The patch seems correct, but it becomes overcomplicated. What about:
> - restoring QCOM_SCM stubs
The stubs are what has led to the previous bugs in this area to often
go unnoticed for too long, as illustrated by your suggestion
> - making ARM_SMMU select QCOM_SCM if ARM_SMMU_QCOM
I assume you meant "select QCOM_SCM if ARCH_QCOM",
after we stop using ARM_SMMU_QCOM?
> This would have almost the same result as with your patch, but without
> extra ARM_SMMU_QCOM Kconfig symbol.
The "almost" is the problem: consider the case of
CONFIG_ARM=y
CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST=y
CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM=n
CONFIG_ARM_SMMU=y
CONFIG_DRM_MSM=m
CONFIG_QCOM_SCM=m (selected by DRM_MSM)
The stubs here lead to ARM_SMMU linking against the QCOM_SCM
driver from built-in code, which fails because QCOM_SCM itself
is a loadable module.
We can move the "select QCOM_SCM" in the ARM_SMMU_QCOM
symbol if we make that a tristate though, if you want to separate it
a little more.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists