[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWPXixp/J6KIzWp6@lahna>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:19:55 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Kate Hsuan <hpa@...hat.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] ACPI: delay enumeration of devices with a _DEP
pointing to an INT3472 device
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 08:56:57PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> +/* List of HIDs for which we honor deps of matching ACPI devs, when checking _DEP lists. */
> +static const char * const acpi_honor_dep_ids[] = {
> + "INT3472", /* Camera sensor PMIC / clk and regulator info */
Is there some reason why we can't do this for all devices with _DEP?
That way we don't need to maintain lists like this.
Otherwise looks good.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists