[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWPiU+9G0AKglHmi@eldamar.lan>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:05:55 +0200
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc: Jeremy Cline <jcline@...hat.com>, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/nouveau: fix a use-after-free in postclose()
Hi Ben,
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:32:31PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> It may have been, we're in the process of trying to change around how we
> currently accept nouveau patches to stop this from happening in the future.
>
> Ben, whenever you get a moment can you take a look at this?
>
> On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 09:03 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:00:51PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > This patch series is:
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
> > >
> > > Btw - in the future if you need to send a respin of multiple patches, you
> > > need
> > > to send it as it's own separate series instead of replying to the previous
> > > one
> > > (one-off respins can just be posted as replies though), otherwise
> > > patchwork
> > > won't pick it up
> >
> > Did this patch series somehow fall through the cracks or got lost?
Looking some older threads, noticed this one. Ben did you got a chance
to look at it, or is it now irrelevant by other means?
Regards,
Salvatore
Powered by blists - more mailing lists