linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2] mt76: mt7615: mt7622: fix ibss and meshpoint

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:12:16 +0200
From:   Nick <vincent@...temli.org>
To:     Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, nbd@....name,
        lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com, ryder.lee@...iatek.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        sean.wang@...iatek.com, shayne.chen@...iatek.com,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] mt76: mt7615: mt7622: fix ibss and meshpoint

My tests on todays OpenWrt Trunk with my and without my patch showed:
- MT7622: AP + AdHoc (only AP is working, in every case)
- BPI-MT7615: AP + AdHoc (with and without my patch still works).

I thought something would change if I apply my patch with the 
HW-Addresses. However everything stays the same:

With my patch:
AdHoc: Shenzhen_4e:4b:dd (38:83:9a:4e:4b:dd)
AP: address: 3a:83:9a:4e:4b:dd (3a:83:9a:4e:4b:dd)

Without my patch:
AdHoc: Shenzhen_4e:4b:dd (38:83:9a:4e:4b:dd)
AP: 3a:83:9a:4e:4b:dd (3a:83:9a:4e:4b:dd)

Bests
Nick

On 10/9/21 15:22, Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Nick wrote:
>> On 10/9/21 10:32, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>>> Nick Hainke <vincent@...temli.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> Fixes: d8d59f66d136 ("mt76: mt7615: support 16 interfaces").
>>> The fixes tag should be in the end, before Signed-off-by tags. But I can
>>> fix that during commit.
>> Thanks for feedback. Already changed that locally but I did not want to spam
>> you with another RFC v3. :)
>> I was able to organize me a BPI-MT7615 PCIE Express Card. With and without
>> this patch beacons were sent on the mt7615 pcie, so the patch did not make
>> any difference. However, the mt7622 wifi will only work with my patch.
> Does Mesh+AP or Ad-Hoc+AP also work on MT7622 and does it still work on
> MT7615E card with your patch applied?