[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211011112719.3951784-8-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 14:27:11 +0300
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
To: <mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
<nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
CC: <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 07/15] clk: at91: sam9x60-pll: use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL
Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL() to avoid any inconsistency b/w the rate
computed in sam9x60_frac_pll_recalc_rate() and the one computed in
sam9x60_frac_pll_compute_mul_frac().
Fixes: 43b1bb4a9b3e1 ("clk: at91: clk-sam9x60-pll: re-factor to support plls with multiple outputs")
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
---
drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
index 7020d3bf6e13..a73d7c96ce1d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ static unsigned long sam9x60_frac_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
struct sam9x60_pll_core *core = to_sam9x60_pll_core(hw);
struct sam9x60_frac *frac = to_sam9x60_frac(core);
- return (parent_rate * (frac->mul + 1) +
- ((u64)parent_rate * frac->frac >> 22));
+ return parent_rate * (frac->mul + 1) +
+ DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)parent_rate * frac->frac, (1 << 22));
}
static int sam9x60_frac_pll_set(struct sam9x60_pll_core *core)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists