linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 04/12] iommu/mediatek: Add device_link between the consumer and the larb devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e00b92db-0562-27ca-2f96-1f03ff824988@collabora.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 14:36:13 +0200
From:   Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com>
To:     Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc:     Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, youlin.pei@...iatek.com,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>, anan.sun@...iatek.com,
        yi.kuo@...iatek.com, acourbot@...omium.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
        Eizan Miyamoto <eizan@...omium.org>,
        anthony.huang@...iatek.com,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/12] iommu/mediatek: Add device_link between the
 consumer and the larb devices



On 29.09.21 03:37, Yong Wu wrote:
> MediaTek IOMMU-SMI diagram is like below. all the consumer connect with
> smi-larb, then connect with smi-common.
> 
>          M4U
>           |
>      smi-common
>           |
>    -------------
>    |         |    ...
>    |         |
> larb1     larb2
>    |         |
> vdec       venc
> 
> When the consumer works, it should enable the smi-larb's power which
> also need enable the smi-common's power firstly.
> 
> Thus, First of all, use the device link connect the consumer and the
> smi-larbs. then add device link between the smi-larb and smi-common.
> 
> This patch adds device_link between the consumer and the larbs.
> 
> When device_link_add, I add the flag DL_FLAG_STATELESS to avoid calling
> pm_runtime_xx to keep the original status of clocks. It can avoid two
> issues:
> 1) Display HW show fastlogo abnormally reported in [1]. At the beggining,
> all the clocks are enabled before entering kernel, but the clocks for
> display HW(always in larb0) will be gated after clk_enable and clk_disable
> called from device_link_add(->pm_runtime_resume) and rpm_idle. The clock
> operation happened before display driver probe. At that time, the display
> HW will be abnormal.
> 
> 2) A deadlock issue reported in [2]. Use DL_FLAG_STATELESS to skip
> pm_runtime_xx to avoid the deadlock.
> 
> Corresponding, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER can't be added, then
> device_link_removed should be added explicitly.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/1564213888.22908.4.camel@mhfsdcap03/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1086569/
> 
> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
> Tested-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de> # BPI-R2/MT7623
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c    | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>   2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index d5848f78a677..a2fa55899434 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -560,22 +560,44 @@ static struct iommu_device *mtk_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>   {
>   	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
>   	struct mtk_iommu_data *data;
> +	struct device_link *link;
> +	struct device *larbdev;
> +	unsigned int larbid;
>   
>   	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops)
>   		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); /* Not a iommu client device */
>   
>   	data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Link the consumer device with the smi-larb device(supplier)
> +	 * The device in each a larb is a independent HW. thus only link
> +	 * one larb here.
> +	 */
> +	larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[0]);

so larbid is always the same for all the ids of a device? If so
maybe it worth testing it and return error if this is not the case.

Thanks,
Dafna

> +	larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev;
> +	link = device_link_add(dev, larbdev,
> +			       DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_STATELESS);
> +	if (!link)
> +		dev_err(dev, "Unable to link %s\n", dev_name(larbdev));
>   	return &data->iommu;
>   }
>   
>   static void mtk_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
>   {
>   	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> +	struct mtk_iommu_data *data;
> +	struct device *larbdev;
> +	unsigned int larbid;
>   
>   	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops)
>   		return;
>   
> +	data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> +	larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[0]);
> +	larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev;
> +	device_link_remove(dev, larbdev);
> +
>   	iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c
> index 4d7809432239..e6f13459470e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c
> @@ -423,7 +423,9 @@ static struct iommu_device *mtk_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>   	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
>   	struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec;
>   	struct mtk_iommu_data *data;
> -	int err, idx = 0;
> +	int err, idx = 0, larbid;
> +	struct device_link *link;
> +	struct device *larbdev;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * In the deferred case, free the existed fwspec.
> @@ -453,6 +455,14 @@ static struct iommu_device *mtk_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>   
>   	data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>   
> +	/* Link the consumer device with the smi-larb device(supplier) */
> +	larbid = mt2701_m4u_to_larb(fwspec->ids[0]);
> +	larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev;
> +	link = device_link_add(dev, larbdev,
> +			       DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_STATELESS);
> +	if (!link)
> +		dev_err(dev, "Unable to link %s\n", dev_name(larbdev));
> +
>   	return &data->iommu;
>   }
>   
> @@ -473,10 +483,18 @@ static void mtk_iommu_probe_finalize(struct device *dev)
>   static void mtk_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
>   {
>   	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> +	struct mtk_iommu_data *data;
> +	struct device *larbdev;
> +	unsigned int larbid;
>   
>   	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops)
>   		return;
>   
> +	data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> +	larbid = mt2701_m4u_to_larb(fwspec->ids[0]);
> +	larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev;
> +	device_link_remove(dev, larbdev);
> +
>   	iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
>   }
>   
>