lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aae81415-d460-c2e2-c342-3f80c3618708@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 10:25:03 +0800
From:   Xuesong Chen <xuesong.chen@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     catalin.marinas@....com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
        james.morse@....com, will@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
        tony.luck@...el.com, bp@...en8.de, mingo@...nel.org,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, mark.rutland@....com,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jayachandran C <c.jayachandran@...il.com>,
        Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
        xuesong.chen@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: MCFG: Consolidate the separate PCI MCFG table
 entry list

Hello Bjorn,

On 09/10/2021 05:31, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Jayachandran, Tomasz; not sure if they're still around, but just
> in case they have a comment on any reasons for keeping the
> pci_mcfg_list list separate.]
> 
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 04:40:12PM +0800, Xuesong Chen wrote:
>> The PCI MCFG entry list is discrete on x86 and other architectures like
>> arm64 in current implementation, this list variable can be consolidated
>> for unnecessary duplication and other purposes, for example, we can remove
>> some of the 'arch' specific codes in the APEI/EINJ module and re-implement
>> it in a more common arch-agnostic way.
> 
> This commit log could be more explicit about what's going on here.
> 
> From deciphering the patch, I think it takes advantage of the fact
> that struct pci_mmcfg_region and struct mcfg_entry contain basically
> the same information, but pci_mmcfg_region contains a little extra
> information (a struct resource, a virtual address, and a name).
> 
Given the PCI MCFG entries are not too much in the reality, so the potential 
memory space penalty for this little extra information, IMO, can be ignored.
> To reduce the redundancy, it:
> 
>   - Moves the "struct pci_mmcfg_region" definition from
>     arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h to include/linux/pci.h, where it
>     can be shared across arches.
Right.
> 
>   - Moves pci_mmcfg_list (a list of pci_mmcfg_region structs) from
>     arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c to drivers/pci/pci.c, where it can
>     be shared across arches.
Right.
> 
>   - On x86 (which does not enable CONFIG_ACPI_MCFG), pci_mmcfg_list is
>     built in arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c as before.
Ah, this pci_mmcfg_list maybe is not built-in as before since it will use
the shared one re-defined in drivers/pci/pci.c
> 
>   - Removes the "struct mcfg_entry" from drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c.
Right, this can be consolidated with "struct pci_mmcfg_region", we need only one.
> 
>   - Replaces pci_mcfg_list (previously a list of mcfg_entry structs)
>     in drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c with the newly-shared pci_mmcfg_list (a
>     list of pci_mmcfg_region structs).
Right,this is the specific consolidation useage scenario。 
> 
>   - On ARM64 (which does enable CONFIG_ACPI_MCFG), pci_mmcfg_list is
>     built in drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c.
Ah, the newly shared 'pci_mmcfg_list' re-defined in pci.c will be used by 
drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c, which just like what the x86 does.
IOW, we move the 'pci_mmcfg_list' to the common 'drivers/pci/pci.c', then
both the arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c and drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c on arm64
will use that by the 'extern struct list_head pci_mmcfg_list' declaration.
> 
> Does that sound about right?
Bjorn, for the commit log, do you think I need to add the above steps you mentioned
into the log message to make it be more explicit? I'd like to update it if the
answer is yes...

Feel free to let me know if you have any comments about the code itself.

Xuesong
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Xuesong Chen <xuesong.chen@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h | 17 +----------------
>>  arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c |  2 --
>>  drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c        | 34 +++++++++++++---------------------
>>  drivers/pci/pci.c              |  2 ++
>>  include/linux/pci.h            | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>  5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h
>> index 490411d..1f4257c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h
>> @@ -146,20 +146,7 @@ static inline int  __init pci_acpi_init(void)
>>  extern void pcibios_fixup_irqs(void);
>>  
>>  /* pci-mmconfig.c */
>> -
>> -/* "PCI MMCONFIG %04x [bus %02x-%02x]" */
>> -#define PCI_MMCFG_RESOURCE_NAME_LEN (22 + 4 + 2 + 2)
>> -
>> -struct pci_mmcfg_region {
>> -	struct list_head list;
>> -	struct resource res;
>> -	u64 address;
>> -	char __iomem *virt;
>> -	u16 segment;
>> -	u8 start_bus;
>> -	u8 end_bus;
>> -	char name[PCI_MMCFG_RESOURCE_NAME_LEN];
>> -};
>> +struct pci_mmcfg_region;
>>  
>>  extern int __init pci_mmcfg_arch_init(void);
>>  extern void __init pci_mmcfg_arch_free(void);
>> @@ -174,8 +161,6 @@ extern struct pci_mmcfg_region *__init pci_mmconfig_add(int segment, int start,
>>  
>>  extern struct list_head pci_mmcfg_list;
>>  
>> -#define PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(bus)      ((bus) << 20)
>> -
>>  /*
>>   * On AMD Fam10h CPUs, all PCI MMIO configuration space accesses must use
>>   * %eax.  No other source or target registers may be used.  The following
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c b/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
>> index 758cbfe..0b961fe6 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
>> @@ -31,8 +31,6 @@
>>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(pci_mmcfg_lock);
>>  #define pci_mmcfg_lock_held() lock_is_held(&(pci_mmcfg_lock).dep_map)
>>  
>> -LIST_HEAD(pci_mmcfg_list);
>> -
>>  static void __init pci_mmconfig_remove(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg)
>>  {
>>  	if (cfg->res.parent)
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
>> index 53cab97..d9506b0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
>> @@ -13,14 +13,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
>>  #include <linux/pci-ecam.h>
>>  
>> -/* Structure to hold entries from the MCFG table */
>> -struct mcfg_entry {
>> -	struct list_head	list;
>> -	phys_addr_t		addr;
>> -	u16			segment;
>> -	u8			bus_start;
>> -	u8			bus_end;
>> -};
>> +extern struct list_head pci_mmcfg_list;
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS
>>  struct mcfg_fixup {
>> @@ -214,16 +207,13 @@ static void pci_mcfg_apply_quirks(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
>>  #endif
>>  }
>>  
>> -/* List to save MCFG entries */
>> -static LIST_HEAD(pci_mcfg_list);
>> -
>>  int pci_mcfg_lookup(struct acpi_pci_root *root, struct resource *cfgres,
>>  		    const struct pci_ecam_ops **ecam_ops)
>>  {
>>  	const struct pci_ecam_ops *ops = &pci_generic_ecam_ops;
>>  	struct resource *bus_res = &root->secondary;
>>  	u16 seg = root->segment;
>> -	struct mcfg_entry *e;
>> +	struct pci_mmcfg_region *e;
>>  	struct resource res;
>>  
>>  	/* Use address from _CBA if present, otherwise lookup MCFG */
>> @@ -233,10 +223,10 @@ int pci_mcfg_lookup(struct acpi_pci_root *root, struct resource *cfgres,
>>  	/*
>>  	 * We expect the range in bus_res in the coverage of MCFG bus range.
>>  	 */
>> -	list_for_each_entry(e, &pci_mcfg_list, list) {
>> -		if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start <= bus_res->start &&
>> -		    e->bus_end >= bus_res->end) {
>> -			root->mcfg_addr = e->addr;
>> +	list_for_each_entry(e, &pci_mmcfg_list, list) {
>> +		if (e->segment == seg && e->start_bus <= bus_res->start &&
>> +		    e->end_bus >= bus_res->end) {
>> +			root->mcfg_addr = e->address;
>>  		}
>>  
>>  	}
>> @@ -268,7 +258,7 @@ static __init int pci_mcfg_parse(struct acpi_table_header *header)
>>  {
>>  	struct acpi_table_mcfg *mcfg;
>>  	struct acpi_mcfg_allocation *mptr;
>> -	struct mcfg_entry *e, *arr;
>> +	struct pci_mmcfg_region *e, *arr;
>>  	int i, n;
>>  
>>  	if (header->length < sizeof(struct acpi_table_mcfg))
>> @@ -285,10 +275,12 @@ static __init int pci_mcfg_parse(struct acpi_table_header *header)
>>  
>>  	for (i = 0, e = arr; i < n; i++, mptr++, e++) {
>>  		e->segment = mptr->pci_segment;
>> -		e->addr =  mptr->address;
>> -		e->bus_start = mptr->start_bus_number;
>> -		e->bus_end = mptr->end_bus_number;
>> -		list_add(&e->list, &pci_mcfg_list);
>> +		e->address =  mptr->address;
>> +		e->start_bus = mptr->start_bus_number;
>> +		e->end_bus = mptr->end_bus_number;
>> +		e->res.start = e->address + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(e->start_bus);
>> +		e->res.end = e->address + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(e->end_bus + 1) - 1;
>> +		list_add(&e->list, &pci_mmcfg_list);
>>  	}
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index ce2ab62..899004e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@
>>  int pci_pci_problems;
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_pci_problems);
>>  
>> +LIST_HEAD(pci_mmcfg_list);
>> +
>>  unsigned int pci_pm_d3hot_delay;
>>  
>>  static void pci_pme_list_scan(struct work_struct *work);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>> index cd8aa6f..71e4c06 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>> @@ -55,6 +55,23 @@
>>  #define PCI_RESET_PROBE		true
>>  #define PCI_RESET_DO_RESET	false
>>  
>> +#define PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(bus)      ((bus) << 20)
>> +
>> +/* "PCI MMCONFIG %04x [bus %02x-%02x]" */
>> +#define PCI_MMCFG_RESOURCE_NAME_LEN (22 + 4 + 2 + 2)
>> +
>> +/* pci mcfg region */
>> +struct pci_mmcfg_region {
>> +	struct list_head list;
>> +	struct resource res;
>> +	u64 address;
>> +	char __iomem *virt;
>> +	u16 segment;
>> +	u8 start_bus;
>> +	u8 end_bus;
>> +	char name[PCI_MMCFG_RESOURCE_NAME_LEN];
>> +};
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * The PCI interface treats multi-function devices as independent
>>   * devices.  The slot/function address of each device is encoded
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ