linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] static_call: fix null-ptr-deref in static_call_del

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eb197332-5a33-49a9-85f3-e95a745c6de9@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:18:55 +0800
From:   "wanghai (M)" <wanghai38@...wei.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:     <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, <jbaron@...mai.com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        <ardb@...nel.org>, <mingo@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] static_call: fix null-ptr-deref in static_call_del_module


在 2021/10/9 18:00, Peter Zijlstra 写道:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 03:44:28PM +0800, Wang Hai wrote:
>> I got a NULL pointer dereference report when doing fault injection test:
>>
>> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000009
>> ...
>> RIP: 0010:static_call_del_module+0x7a/0x100
>> ...
>> Call Trace:
>>   static_call_module_notify+0x1e1/0x200
>>   notifier_call_chain_robust+0x6f/0xe0
>>   blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust+0x4e/0x70
>>   load_module+0x21f7/0x2b60
>>   __do_sys_finit_module+0xb0/0xf0
>>   ? __do_sys_finit_module+0xb0/0xf0
>>   __x64_sys_finit_module+0x1a/0x20
>>   do_syscall_64+0x34/0xb0
>>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>>
>> When loading a module, if it fails to allocate memory for static
>> calls, it will delete the non-existent mods (mods == 1) in the
>> static_call_module_notify()'s error path.
>>
>> static_call_module_notify
>> 	static_call_add_module
>> 		__static_call_init
>> 			site_mod = kzalloc() // fault injection
>> 	static_call_del_module // access non-existent mods
>>
>> This patch fixes the bug by skipping the operation when the key
>> has no mods.
>>
>> Fixes: a945c8345ec0 ("static_call: Allow early init")
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   kernel/static_call.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/static_call.c b/kernel/static_call.c
>> index 43ba0b1e0edb..c3f8ffc5a52f 100644
>> --- a/kernel/static_call.c
>> +++ b/kernel/static_call.c
>> @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static void static_call_del_module(struct module *mod)
>>   
>>   	for (site = start; site < stop; site++) {
>>   		key = static_call_key(site);
>> -		if (key == prev_key)
>> +		if (key == prev_key || !static_call_key_has_mods(key))
>>   			continue;
>>   
>>   		prev_key = key;
> Should you not update prev_key in that case? Also have you looked at
> jump_label_del_module() which is very similar in construction?
> .
Thanks for your guidance, as with jump_label_del_module(),
the prev_key needs to be updated, can it be fixed like this?

--- a/kernel/static_call.c
+++ b/kernel/static_call.c
@@ -404,9 +404,9 @@ static void static_call_del_module(struct module *mod)
                         continue;

                 prev_key = key;
+               site_mod = static_call_key_next(key);

-               for (prev = &key->mods, site_mod = key->mods;
-                    site_mod && site_mod->mod != mod;
+               for (prev = &key->mods; site_mod && site_mod->mod != mod;
                      prev = &site_mod->next, site_mod = site_mod->next)
                         ;

-- 
Wang Hai