[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11303414.9r73sBlGM0@pliszka>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:32:30 +0200
From: Sebastian Krzyszkowiak <sebastian.krzyszkowiak@...i.sm>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>, kernel@...i.sm,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] power: supply: max17042_battery: Clear status bits in interrupt handler
On wtorek, 14 wrzeĊnia 2021 14:18:05 CEST Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
> The gauge requires us to clear the status bits manually for some alerts
> to be properly dismissed. Previously the IRQ was configured to react only
> on falling edge, which wasn't technically correct (the ALRT line is active
> low), but it had a happy side-effect of preventing interrupt storms
> on uncleared alerts from happening.
>
> Fixes: 7fbf6b731bca ("power: supply: max17042: Do not enforce (incorrect)
> interrupt trigger type") Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Krzyszkowiak <sebastian.krzyszkowiak@...i.sm>
> ---
> v2: added a comment on why it clears all alert bits
> ---
> drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c
> b/drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c index 8dffae76b6a3..da78ffe6a3ec
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/max17042_battery.c
> @@ -876,6 +876,10 @@ static irqreturn_t max17042_thread_handler(int id, void
> *dev) max17042_set_soc_threshold(chip, 1);
> }
>
> + /* we implicitly handle all alerts via power_supply_changed */
> + regmap_clear_bits(chip->regmap, MAX17042_STATUS,
> + 0xFFFF & ~(STATUS_POR_BIT |
STATUS_BST_BIT));
> +
> power_supply_changed(chip->battery);
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
Ping? Seems this didn't get applied yet.
S.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists