[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211012180348.zalanzdw3ykqg4db@bogus>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:03:48 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc: op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org, jens.wiklander@...aro.org,
jerome@...issier.org, daniel.thompson@...aro.org,
maxim.uvarov@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tee: optee: Fix missing devices unregister during
optee_remove
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 01:01:16PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> When OP-TEE driver is built as a module, OP-TEE client devices
> registered on TEE bus during probe should be unregistered during
> optee_remove. So implement optee_unregister_devices() accordingly.
>
> Fixes: c3fa24af9244 ("tee: optee: add TEE bus device enumeration support")
> Reported-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 3 +++
> drivers/tee/optee/device.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> index ccad3c7c8f6d..3915dc574503 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> @@ -586,6 +586,9 @@ static int optee_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct optee *optee = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> + /* Unregister OP-TEE specific client devices on TEE bus */
> + optee_unregister_devices();
> +
This is not based on FF-A support series by Jens I assume. I added
optee_unregister_devices to optee_remove_common and that fixes the issue
I reported. I haven't followed the comments by Jens on the approach yet.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists