[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ily2uj1d.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:42:22 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: remove reference to now removed
mandatory-locking doc
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> writes:
> When I removed the document on mandatory locking from the tree, I missed
> removing the reference to it from the index file.
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/index.rst | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/index.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/index.rst
> index c0ad233963ae..bee63d42e5ec 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/index.rst
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ algorithms work.
> fiemap
> files
> locks
> - mandatory-locking
> mount_api
> quota
So this is a fine change, but there's a couple more:
- Documentation/filesystems/locks.rst still has a section on mandatory
locking that, presumably, can just come out; it has a reference to
the now-removed file.
- There is also a reference (dated April 1996) in the pseudo-changelog
comments at the head of fs/locks.c. I'd take the whole pile out, but
that's me...
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists