[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+E=9oto+8PptNNSzwkwrRd+_Ty4GpeyxE=xAggTa140pJxk9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 14:03:00 +0800
From: David Yang <davidcomponentone@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: jdike@...toit.com, richard@....at, anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com,
johannes.berg@...el.com, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH virt-pci] Fix application of sizeof to pointer
I'm agree with you. Using the "buf->data" instead is better.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 08:48:27PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 11:23 +0800, davidcomponentone@...il.com wrote:
> > From: David Yang <davidcomponentone@...il.com>
> >
> > The coccinelle check report:
> > "./arch/um/drivers/virt-pci.c:192:20-26:
> > ERROR: application of sizeof to pointer"
> > Using the "sizeof(buf->data)" to fix it.
> []
> > diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/virt-pci.c b/arch/um/drivers/virt-pci.c
> []
> > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static unsigned long um_pci_cfgspace_read(void *priv, unsigned int offset,
> > buf = get_cpu_var(um_pci_msg_bufs);
> > data = buf->data;
> >
> > - memset(data, 0xff, sizeof(data));
> > + memset(data, 0xff, sizeof(buf->data));
>
> Perhaps change this to:
>
> memset(buf->data, 0xff, sizeof(buf->data));
> data = buf->data;
>
> but honestly, the indirection to data doesn't make the code
> much more readable so maybe just remove data altogether.
> ---
> arch/um/drivers/virt-pci.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/virt-pci.c b/arch/um/drivers/virt-pci.c
> index c080666330234..75e05ead97b9a 100644
> --- a/arch/um/drivers/virt-pci.c
> +++ b/arch/um/drivers/virt-pci.c
> @@ -180,7 +180,6 @@ static unsigned long um_pci_cfgspace_read(void *priv, unsigned int offset,
> };
> /* buf->data is maximum size - we may only use parts of it */
> struct um_pci_message_buffer *buf;
> - u8 *data;
> unsigned long ret = ~0ULL;
>
> if (!dev)
> @@ -189,7 +188,7 @@ static unsigned long um_pci_cfgspace_read(void *priv, unsigned int offset,
> buf = get_cpu_var(um_pci_msg_bufs);
> data = buf->data;
>
> - memset(data, 0xff, sizeof(data));
> + memset(buf->data, 0xff, sizeof(buf->data));
>
> switch (size) {
> case 1:
> @@ -204,22 +203,22 @@ static unsigned long um_pci_cfgspace_read(void *priv, unsigned int offset,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (um_pci_send_cmd(dev, &hdr, sizeof(hdr), NULL, 0, data, 8))
> + if (um_pci_send_cmd(dev, &hdr, sizeof(hdr), NULL, 0, buf->data, 8))
> goto out;
>
> switch (size) {
> case 1:
> - ret = data[0];
> + ret = buf->data[0];
> break;
> case 2:
> - ret = le16_to_cpup((void *)data);
> + ret = le16_to_cpup((void *)buf->data);
> break;
> case 4:
> - ret = le32_to_cpup((void *)data);
> + ret = le32_to_cpup((void *)buf->data);
> break;
> #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> case 8:
> - ret = le64_to_cpup((void *)data);
> + ret = le64_to_cpup((void *)buf->data);
> break;
> #endif
> default:
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists